Quantum Mechanics: Expression for electron density

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the expression for electron density in quantum mechanics, specifically from Marder's Condensed Matter Physics. The formula involves integrating the squared many-electron wavefunction while singling out one electron's coordinates, which reflects the probability density of finding an electron in a given volume. The multiplication by N ensures the density is normalized to the total number of electrons rather than one. Participants clarify that the integral represents the probability of locating an electron within a specified volume element. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of electron density in quantum mechanics.
handsomecat
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about the expression for the electron density.

For example in Marder's Condensed Matter Physics, he writes this

\rho(\vec{r}) = N \int \Psi^{*} \delta( \vec{r} - \vec{r}_1) \Psi d\vec{r}_1 \ldots d\vec{r}_N \deltawhat's going on?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you confused about? If you're just getting started in QM you might want to pick up Griffiths book.
 
handsomecat said:
I'm a little confused about the expression for the electron density.

For example in Marder's Condensed Matter Physics, he writes this

\rho(\vec{r}) = N \int \Psi^{*} \delta( \vec{r} - \vec{r}_1) \Psi d\vec{r}_1 \ldots d\vec{r}_N \deltawhat's going on?

He's taking the many-electron wavefunction, squaring it, and integrating over all but one of the coordinates.
I.e.,
<br /> \rho(\vec r) \equiv N \int d^3r_2 d^3r_3 d^3r_4\ldots d^3r_N |\Psi(\vec r,\vec r_2,\vec r_3,\vec r_4,\ldots,\vec r_N)|^2<br />
it desn't matter which one is singled out because the wavefunction is either symmetric or antisymmetric in all it's coordinates and thus the squared wavefunction is symmetric in it's coordinates. multiplication by N is because we want rho normalized such that
\int d^3r \rho = N
rather than normalized to 1.
 
Ah thank you! So am I right to say that this integral

<br /> \int d^3r_2 d^3r_3 d^3r_4\ldots d^3r_N |\Psi(\vec r,\vec r_2,\vec r_3,\vec r_4,\ldots,\vec r_N)|^2<br />

is just the probability of finding an electron in any volume element?
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K