Quantum Mechanics & Force: Wave-Particle Duality

cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
if matter in QM is considered to be more like waves with that particle duality what happens when a force is applied in QM, is it like classical where the force is a vector or does that change also in QM.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Someone correct me if I'm wrong :)

I think that in QM we rely on the concept of fields.
 
Force is a concept in Newtonian mechanics that describes an interaction between two subsystems (say, two particles). In quantum theory, one has a different way to do so: one describes the interaction potential (which, in the case of the quantum description of a classical system, is indeed the potential energy that would give you the said force). The geometrical meaning of a force as a vector is lost in quantum mechanics (that is, you can't do anything with it, except use it to derive the interaction potential).

For instance, if you have two charged particles at positions p1 and p2, then you will have an interaction potential due to Coulomb's "force" as given by q1 q2 /(4 pi eps0 |p1 - p2|)

This term will enter into the Schroedinger equation which tells you how the quantum state (the "waves" if you want to) will change, and lo and behold, they will change in a way which resembles the action of a repulsive or attractive force.
 
alright thanks.
 
The reason why we don't speak of force is that QM is based on Hamiltonian mechanics, which is Kinetic + Potential Term.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
418
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top