Quantum Mechanics pendulum problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a pendulum, specifically a grandfather clock pendulum with a known period and amplitude. The original poster seeks to determine the value of n related to the energy eigenvalues of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the classical energy of the pendulum to its quantum mechanical energy eigenvalues. They question how to calculate the potential energy at maximum displacement and how to derive the height of the pendulum bob.
  • Some participants suggest drawing diagrams to visualize the problem and propose using the period to find the length of the pendulum.
  • Others express uncertainty about how to calculate the height reached by the pendulum bob and the implications of the derived equations.
  • There are discussions about the validity of the calculations and whether the resulting value of n is reasonable.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not provide certain information, such as the angle at maximum displacement, which complicates the calculations. The original poster also expresses confusion regarding the relationship between classical and quantum mechanics in this context.

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The pendulum of a grandfather clock has a period of 1s and makes excursions of 3cm either side of dead centre. Given that the bob weighs 0.2kg, around what value of n would you expect its non negligible quantum amplitudes to cluster?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think the n here refers to the nth energy eigenvalue so En = (n + 1/2) h/2pi w

How do i work this out? My guess is that I need to work out the energy of a classical harmonic oscillator and equate this to (n+1/2) h/2pi w to get n?

So i know w = 2pi ... but how do i work out the energy of the oscillator? At max displacement it will have no KE, only PE..but how do i work out what this is?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dude, draw a picture with both the equilibrium and final positions, then find out how high the final position is w.r.t to the equilibrium position.
 
graphene said:
dude, draw a picture with both the equilibrium and final positions, then find out how high the final position is w.r.t to the equilibrium position.

thanks..but this is my problem. i don't know how high the final position is wrt initial position... all they say is that it makes excursions of 3cm either side of dead centre...but i don't know what what angle it is at at the extrema, so how can i work out how high it goes?

Thanks
 
If you have the period, don't you have the length? T = 2pi sqrt(l/g) approximately.
From this you can get the height? I have no knowledge of quantum mechanics so this is just a shot in the dark.
 
Thanks, but l in that equation gives you the length of the string. I still don't see how you can get the height..
 
bon said:
Thanks, but l in that equation gives you the length of the string. I still don't see how you can get the height..

Again, just a shot in the dark, but by height I'm guessing you mean the height the mass reaches at it's full swing?
You know its 3 cm far, and l long. The height is x= 3 /(tan ( 90 - arctan(3/l))
 
ok thanks so i get h = 1.79 x 10^-3m

is this right?

This means E total = mgh = 0.2 * 9.8 * h = 3.5 x 10^-3 J

so now do i set (n+1/2) h/2pi w = 3.5 x 10^-3 ?

This gives n as something ridiculously large (5.29 x 10 ^30). Is this right?
 
The equation I gave was wrong, sorry man. I have a new relation:

9 - 2Lx + x^2 = 0

which gives

x = L +- sqrt(4L^2 - 36) / 2This comes from considering it's equilibrium and max and getting an isosceles triangle.
You split it into 2 right angle triangles. Use pythagoras to get 3^2 + (L-x)^2 = L^2
 
Oh ok - i worked it out myself, using a different method, but i think the answer is the same, right?

Is my final answer correct then (to someone who knows about the quantum side of the question as well...)?
 
  • #10
anyone?
 
  • #11
it just seems the number n is too big... have i interpreted the question correctly?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K