Quantum mechanics scattering problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a quantum mechanics scattering problem involving reflection and transmission probabilities for a potential barrier. The user has derived wave functions for regions x<0 and x>0 but is confused about the implications of their calculations, particularly regarding the probability current density being zero for the transmitted wave, suggesting a reflection probability of 1. A response points out an error in the user's wave function for x<0, indicating that it should include an imaginary unit (i) in the exponential term. The user seeks clarification on why this adjustment is necessary and expresses confusion over the implications for the second derivative of the wave function. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to derive accurate physical interpretations.
Vuldoraq
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
Quantum mechanics scattering problem, Please help!

Homework Statement



Calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities for right-incident scattering from the potential
V(x) = V0 for x<0
V(x)= 0 for x>0.
at an energy E <V0. Find the probability density and the probability current density in the region x<0.
What can you say about where the reflection is taking place?


Homework Equations



Stationary Scrodinger Equation,

E\psi(x)=-\frac{h^{2}}{8\pi^{2}m}*\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial\psi^{2}}

Probability density,

\rho(x)=\bar{\psi}\psi

Probability current density,

J_{x}=\frac{ih}{2\pi\m}(\psi\frac{\partial\bar{\psi}}{\partial x}-\bar{\psi}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x})

Transmission probability, T=\frac{J_{trans}}{J_{incident}}

Reflection probabilty, R=\frac{J_{reflected}}{J_{incident}}

Also T+R=1

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi, I have gone some way with this problem and I won't inculde all my calculations (although if you want to see them please just ask and I will post them). Let's start with my solutions to the schrodinger equation in both regions,

\phi(x)=Be^{-K_{1}X} for x<0.

\phi(x)=Ce^{iK_{2}X}+De^{-iK{_2}X} for x>0

where,
k_{1}=\frac{\sqrt{-2m(E-V_{0})}}{\frac{h}{2\pi}}

and,
k_{2}=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\frac{h}{2\pi}}

Now I have that the wave with the B coefecient is the transmitted wave moving to the left and the wave with the C coefficient is the reflected wave moving to the right. The wave with the D coefficient is the right incident wave and is moving to the left.

Now if I calculate the probability current density for the transmitted wave I get zero, since the wave function is real. This means that the refelction probability must be 1. However this implies that no quantume tunneling can occur, which shouldn't be the case. Also it seems way too easy.

Please could someone check through my working and see where I have gone wrong? I have been pondering for ages but can't see the gap in my logic.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please could someone help me? I am really stuck on this one and cannot see where I have gone wrong.

Thanks
 
Hi,

Firstly, your phi(x) for x<0 should have a i on the exponential.


This should change your values for the probability and probability density
 
Hi TFM,

Thankyou for replying I really appreciate it. Please could you explain why there should be an i on the exponential? Because if there is on that one surely there should be on the other term which we have disregarded, and if the other term has an i it's second differential will be negative, when it should be positive?

Thanks again!
 
Well I have:

k\phi(x) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2}

\phi (x)= Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}
 
TFM said:
Well I have:

k\phi(x) = \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2}

\phi (x)= Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}

If you differentiate the above twice you get -k^2 *A or B*phi(x). Thats why I'm confused.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top