Quantum Physics Books: Learn Heisenberg, Dirac, Pauli & More

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for books on quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on topics such as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Dirac notation, Pauli matrices, quantum operators, and Hawking radiation. Participants share their knowledge levels and seek resources suitable for their understanding of quantum theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn quantum theory and seeks book recommendations that cover specific topics in quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant asks for details about the original poster's math and physics knowledge to tailor recommendations.
  • The original poster describes their background in physics and mathematics, indicating familiarity with basic concepts and calculus.
  • Several participants suggest textbooks such as Zettili, Shankar, Bransden & Joachain, Griffiths, and Townsend's "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" as suitable for the original poster's level.
  • One participant emphasizes the "spin-first" approach to learning quantum mechanics, suggesting it simplifies the learning process by starting with finite dimensional state spaces.
  • Another participant notes that most textbooks avoid functional analytical complications, implying that the presentation style may not significantly impact understanding.
  • There is mention of the historical context of the "spin-first" approach, attributing its popularity to J.J. Sakurai and referencing Schwinger's contributions to the topic.
  • Participants highlight the limited availability of mathematical textbooks on quantum mechanics, providing additional recommendations for those interested in a more mathematical perspective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the suggested textbooks, but there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of the "spin-first" approach versus traditional methods. The discussion remains open-ended with no consensus on a singular best approach to learning quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants' recommendations depend on their interpretations of the original poster's background and the specific topics of interest. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with quantum mechanics and the mathematical foundations required for understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking to learn quantum mechanics, particularly those looking for book recommendations that align with their current knowledge and interests in specific quantum topics.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
I'm really interested in quantum theory and would like to learn all that I can about it. I'm looking books for learning quantum physics that contains derivation of Heisenberg uncertainty principle, dirac notation, pauli matrices, quantum operators, hawking radiation, etc. What are good books to QM along these lines?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tosh5457
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your current math and physics knowledge? Be detailed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
Well, essentially all I know about physics I learned from "University Physics by Sears, Young", ie I know the basic of all topics on physics.

On math I learned Calculus 1,2,3,4 by reading "Calculus by James Stewart" and I have some knowledge about basic linear algebra.
 
Then Zettili, Shankar, Bransden&Joachain or Griffiths wrote textbooks on QM which could suit your level.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
Also, "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" by Townsend.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
George Jones said:
Also, "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" by Townsend.
This is a good book. The same spins-first approach is used by the following book that I love

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0321765796/?tag=pfamazon01-20


Definitely read up on some liner algebra first. I think spin-first approach is a much easier way to learn QM.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge, vanhees71 and dextercioby
smodak said:
I think spin-first approach is a much easier way to learn QM.
I was curious why that would be? Is it because one starts with finite dimensional state spaces, thereby avoiding functional analytic complications at first?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
The vast majority of textbooks avoid the functional analytical complications altogether, therefore it won't matter how the material is presented. The "spin first" approach was made famous by the late professor J.J. Sakurai in his wonderful book and thus served as inspiration for other book writers.
Mathematical textbooks on Quantum Mechanics are really very few, I could only mention https://www.amazon.com/dp/981024651X/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and the two-volume book by A. Galindo & P. Pascual https://www.amazon.com/dp/3642838561/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and https://www.amazon.com/dp/3642841317/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge, vanhees71, smodak and 1 other person
In fact, this "spin first" approach was invented by Schwinger in his QM lectures. There's a marvelous book based on them:

J. J. Schwinger, Quantum Mechanics - Symbolism for atomistic measurements, Springer

However, it's not following the typical way. So I rather recommend the mentioned book by Sakurai to start with. Nevertheless, the very first chapter of Schwinger's book is just a must-read for anybody interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
12K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K