Quantum time corr: expectation value of particle motion in Schro. pic

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expectation value of particle motion in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the transition between the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures. The original poster presents a problem involving the calculation of the expectation value C(t,to) = <0|x(t)x(to)|0> for a ground state harmonic oscillator.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the Heisenberg and Schrödinger representations, questioning how to convert position operators and incorporate them into the expectation value. There is confusion about the validity of certain equalities and the role of the evolution operator.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the time dependence of states and operators in different representations. There is ongoing exploration of how to manipulate the operators correctly to maintain the invariance of expectation values, with no clear consensus reached on the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the notation used for energy and Planck's constant, as well as the implications of using the evolution operator in the context of the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the ambiguity in the representation of operators across different pictures.

pfnewt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The expectation value of motion of a particle over a time interval t-to is

C(t,to) = <0|x(t)x(to)|0>
(product of position operators in Heisenberg representation for ground state harmonic oscillator)

Homework Equations


Schrödinger picture:
<ψ(t)|Ω|ψ(t)> = <ψ(to)|U+(t,to) Ω U(t,to)|ψ(to)>

I believe:
U(t,to) = exp[-iωt/h]
U+(t,to) = exp[iωt/h]

Heisenberg rep: time-indep states, time-dep operators
Schrödinger rep: time-dep states, time-indep operators

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused about how to convert x(t) in the Heisenberg representation to the Schrödinger representation and how to incorporate it into C(t,to).

Here is what I scribbled:
<x(t)> = <ψ(t)|x(to)|ψ(t)> = <ψ(to)|exp[iωt/h] x(to) exp[-iωt/h]|ψ(to)>
= <0|exp[iωt/h] x(to) exp[-iωt/h]|0>
Is the first equality even true?

The question seems like it should be simple, but I am sincerely confused. Thanks for your time and for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the Heisenberg picture all time dependence is attributed to the operators, the states carry no time dependence. In the Schrödinger picture this is reversed, the operators are constants but the states change in time.

The connection between the pictures is established by requiring physics to be unchanged. That is expectations values must give the same numbers in both cases.

I believe:
U(t,to) = exp[-iωt/h]
U+(t,to) = exp[iωt/h]

This is a little wrong, why do you write ωt/h?
In the Schrödinger picture you can formally solve the Schrödinger equation by means of the evolution operator U(t,t0) = exp[-iHt/h], where H is the Hamiltonian of the system. So the states will be given by ψ(t)> = U(t,to)|ψ(to)>. To go to the Heisenberg picture you simply have to get rid of the time dependence so you can write |ψ(Heisen.)> = U+(t,to) U(t,to)|ψ(to)> = ψ(to, Schr.)> due to the unitarity of the evolution operator.

Now you can simply apply the same thing in any of your expectation value equations and find how your operators must change in order for the expectation values to be invariant.
 
Hello and thanks for responding. The omega represents energy and the h is supposed to be h bar. I could see how that would look strange actually, so I won't use omega anymore.

Anyway, here is another attempt:

<0|x(t)x(to)|0> = <0|exp[iHt/h]exp[-iHt/h] x(to)x(to)exp [-iHt/h]exp[iHt/h]|0>
= <0|x2|0> = h/(2mω)

This doesn't match my answer for solving it another way :/. I think I understand what to do conceptually, but not mathematically. Are the exponentials supposed to cancel? Aren't those what make the states time-dependent?

I hope I am making some amount of sense. Thanks again.
 
pfnewt said:
<0|x(t)x(to)|0> = <0|exp[iHt/h]exp[-iHt/h] x(to)x(to)exp [-iHt/h]exp[iHt/h]|0>
= <0|x2|0> = h/(2mω)

How did you get exp[iHt/h]exp[-iHt/h] on either side?

The correct way should be:

In the Heisenberg picture you have <0|x(t)x(to)|0>
So using the evolution operator to switch the states to the Schrödinger picture you get:
<0|exp[iHt/h] x(t) x(to) exp[-iHt/h]|0> = <0|U+ x(t) x(to) U |0>

So in order for the expectation value to be invariant you must write
<0|U+ U x(t) U+ U x(to) U+ U |0> = <0|x(t)x(to)|0> due to unitarity of U.

So the operators must change like U x(t) U+

Hope this helps. Note the ambiguity when i write x(t) even in the Schrödinger picture.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K