Quantum tunnelling/alpha decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tmv3v
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum tunneling in the context of alpha decay, specifically addressing how alpha particles can escape the strong nuclear force and the implications for the stability of isotopes. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conceptual clarifications related to nuclear physics and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that quantum tunneling allows particles to have a finite probability of overcoming energy barriers due to the Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant notes that while all elements besides hydrogen have a non-zero probability of radioactive decay, stable elements have such low probabilities that their half-lives are extremely long.
  • A participant expresses understanding that variations in neutron numbers can significantly affect the probability of quantum tunneling.
  • One participant challenges the explanation of tunneling based on the uncertainty principle, suggesting that the wave nature of matter and the properties of wavefunctions provide a more accurate description of the phenomenon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the explanation of quantum tunneling, particularly regarding the role of the uncertainty principle versus the wave nature of particles. There is no consensus on the best explanation for the phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the relationship between neutron numbers and stability is complex and that the probabilities involved in quantum tunneling are sensitive to various factors, including binding energy and energy levels of nuclear components.

tmv3v
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Im a uni student and a Phd student asked me in an alpha decay,
the helium nuclei is bounded by the strong nuclear force, how do the alpha particle overcome such a strong force and shoot out? And he told me it is because of quantum tunnelling.
To my understanding quantum tunnelling is an effect that due to Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle, a particle can have a distribution of energy, which there is a very low but finite probability that a particle can have enough energy to go over the energy barrier.
But I then don't understand why only certain isotopes of an element is radioactive since for those stable elements, quantum tunnelling will still take place. Someone could explain to me:D? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The probability for quantum tunneling to occur is extremely sensitive to the relevant energies (the binding energy of the nucleus, the energy levels occupied by its components, etc.) Technically all elements besides hydrogen are indeed radioactive in that they have a non-zero probability of spontaneously breaking apart. However, the elements we classify as 'stable' have a such a low probability of decaying that their half lives are very long (often many orders of magnitude longer than the age of the universe).
 
Ah ok so everything is radioactive and having one more or less neutron will change the probability of quantum tunneling dramatically!
Thank you!
 
You're welcome. I would also add that the uncertainty principle explanation of tunneling isn't really correct. For one thing, uncertainty in momentum doesn't necessary imply uncertainty in energy. Also, you can have tunneling even when the energy of a system is precisely defined. The wave nature of matter is a better explanation: the wavefunction associated with a particle is a continuous, twice differentiable function (since it has to satisfy the Schrödinger equation) which means it can't abruptly stop if the external potential is well-defined everywhere. So, the particle's wavefunction can't just stop at the barrier, and since it continues through it (though falling off exponentially with distance) there is a non-zero probability of the particle being on the other side.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
523
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K