Quasi-Monochromatic Light and Young's Double Slit Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of quasi-monochromatic light in Young's double-slit experiment. Given a fringe separation of 5.6 mm, a slit separation of 1.0 mm, and a distance of 7 m to the observation plane, the wavelength is derived using the formula for destructive interference. The calculation yields a wavelength of 800 nm, which is confirmed as correct by multiple participants, despite an expected answer of 560 nm. The confusion arises from misinterpretation of the fringe pattern.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's double-slit experiment
  • Familiarity with the formula for destructive interference: y_m = (m+1/2)λL/a
  • Knowledge of wavelength measurement in nanometers
  • Basic principles of light interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of light interference in Young's double-slit experiment
  • Study the derivation and application of the destructive interference formula
  • Learn about fringe patterns and their significance in optics
  • Explore the differences between monochromatic and quasi-monochromatic light sources
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the principles of light interference and wavelength calculations in experimental setups.

whoareyou
Messages
162
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A quasi-monochromatic beam of light illuminates Young's double-slit setup, generating a fringe pattern having 5.6-mm separation between consecutive dark bands. The distance between the place containing the apertures and the plane of observation is 7 m, and the two slits are separated by 1.0 mm. What is the wavelength of the light?

Homework Equations



##y_m = (m+1/2)\lambda L / a## (for destructive interference)

The Attempt at a Solution



##\lambda = \frac {y_m a}{(m+1/2)L}##

Since the separation between consecutive dark bands is 5.6 mm, then we can say that the distance to the first minimum (corresponding to ##m=0##) is ##5.6/2##. Then we have ##a=1## and ##L=7000## and the formula gives ##\lambda=800 nm## but the answer is supposed to be 560 nm. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whoareyou said:
Then we have ##a=1## and ##L=7000## and the formula gives ##\lambda=800 nm## but the answer is supposed to be 560 nm. What am I doing wrong?
Nothing, your result is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K