Question about acceleration and gravity

AI Thread Summary
An object with a mass of 100 kg on a platform accelerating upwards at 10 m/s² would experience a force of 1000 Newtons, not a weight of 1000 kg, as kilograms measure mass and Newtons measure force. On Earth, the same mass would exert a force of approximately 980 Newtons due to gravity. The individual on the accelerating platform would feel about 1.02g, which is slightly more than the force experienced on Earth. If the platform were on Earth and accelerating upwards at 10 m/s², the person would feel a total force of about 2g, combining the force of gravity and the upward acceleration. This illustrates the distinction between mass and weight, emphasizing that scales should measure in Newtons rather than kilograms.
raeshun
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble understanding g-force.So if a object with a mass of 100 kg is sitting on a platform in space.If the platform was accelerating at 10 m/s^2 upwards would the weight of the object be 1000 kg? If so why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on the platform would be

F=ma
=100kg x 10m/s2
=1000 Newtons (not Kg)

On Earth the force on the ground would be

F=mg
=100kg x 9.8m/s2
=980 Newtons.

About the same. So if this 100kg mass on the platform was a man he would feel roughly the same as he does on Earth (eg 1g).

To be precise he would be experiencing 10/9.8 = 1.02g
 
raeshun said:
I am having trouble understanding g-force.So if a object with a mass of 100 kg is sitting on a platform in space.If the platform was accelerating at 10 m/s^2 upwards would the weight of the object be 1000 kg? If so why?
The kg is a measure of mass, not force. Weight is a force. So a "weight of 100kg" is scientifically incorrect. It is used in everyday speech to stand for "the force exerted by gravity at the Earth's surface on a 100kg mass", but in scientific terms that's (approximately) 1000 Newtons. Likewise, the force required to accelerate a 100kg mass at 10m/s2 in a weightless environment is 1000 N.
 
CWatters said:
The force on the platform would be

F=ma
=100kg x 10m/s2
=1000 Newtons (not Kg)

On Earth the force on the ground would be

F=mg
=100kg x 9.8m/s2
=980 Newtons.

About the same. So if this 100kg mass on the platform was a man he would feel roughly the same as he does on Earth (eg 1g).

To be precise he would be experiencing 10/9.8 = 1.02g

haruspex said:
The kg is a measure of mass, not force. Weight is a force. So a "weight of 100kg" is scientifically incorrect. It is used in everyday speech to stand for "the force exerted by gravity at the Earth's surface on a 100kg mass", but in scientific terms that's (approximately) 1000 Newtons. Likewise, the force required to accelerate a 100kg mass at 10m/s2 in a weightless environment is 1000 N.

So if this happened on Earth ignoring air resistance would the person on the platform feel weightless?
 
What might be confusing is that weighing scales measure the force an object puts on them so they should really be marked in Newtons not Kg. However since we don't normally take weighing scales to the moon they are calibrated for g=9.8 and marked in kg.

If you took kitchen weighing scales to the moon with a 1kg test mass you would discover they would read INCORRECTLY. For example they would under read by a factor of six yet the mass has not changed.
 
raeshun said:
So if this happened on Earth ignoring air resistance would the person on the platform feel weightless?

EDIT: haruspex is correct below. If the platform was on Earth and accelerating upwards at 10m/s2 then would feel about 2g.
 
Last edited:
raeshun said:
So if this happened on Earth ignoring air resistance would the person on the platform feel weightless?
If by "this" you mean the platform accelerating upwards at 10m/s2, they would feel a force of about 2g: 1g to stay put plus another to accelerate upwards.
 
Back
Top