Question about Ampere's law in vacuum and in matter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Ampere's law in vacuum and in matter, specifically the derivation of related equations from Maxwell's equations. Participants explore the conditions under which these derivations hold true and the implications of material properties on the applicability of these laws.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the derivation of \nabla\times{H}=J_f+\partial{D}/\partial{t} from \nabla\times{B}=\mu_0J+\epsilon_0\mu_0\partial{E}/\partial{t}, suggesting that Maxwell's equations in vacuum should suffice for studying electromagnetic fields in matter.
  • Another participant notes that assumptions about the material, such as D being proportional to E, are necessary for the derivation to hold.
  • A different participant introduces the term \partial{P}/\partial{t} as a current that cannot be derived from Ampere's law in vacuum, indicating a limitation in the derivation process.
  • One participant suggests that if D is proportional to E, the derivation works, but acknowledges potential complications if \epsilon_r is a tensor or nonlinear.
  • A later reply proposes that the term \partial{P}/\partial{t} represents a current due to moving bound charges, leading to a formulation of total current density that includes polarization current density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Ampere's law in various materials, with no consensus reached on the conditions under which the derivations are valid.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to assumptions about material properties and the complexity introduced by nonlinear or tensorial permittivity.

Arham
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi

We can derive equation \nabla.D=\rho_f from equation \nabla.E=\rho/\epsilon_0. But what about Ampere's law? I tried to derive \nabla\times{H}=J_f+\partial{D}/\partial{t} from \nabla\times{B}=\mu_0J+\epsilon_0\mu_0\partial{E}/\partial{t} but I could not. This is strange because I thought that Maxwell's equations in vacuum are enough for studying electromagnetic field in any matter and that Maxwell's equations in matter are derivable from them.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are, if you add some assumptions about the material - D proportional (and parallel) to E and so on.
For materials where this is not true, I don't know.
 
\partial{D}/\partial{t}=\epsilon_0\partial{E}/\partial{t}+\partial{P}/\partial{t}. The second term is underivable from Ampere's law in vacuum.
 
Add the assumption that ##D \propto E##, and it works.

In general, this can be wrong, but I don't know if the regular Maxwell equations work there at all. If ##\epsilon_r## is a tensor (or nonlinear), things can get difficult.
 
Dear mfb,

I think I found the solution. \partial{P}/\partial{t} is some kind of current (bound charges are moving). So if we write total current density as J=J_f+\nabla\times{M}+J_p where J_p is polarization current density, we can solve the problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
981
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K