Question about "bound systems"

  • Thread starter Thread starter ORF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
In a bound system of particles, the movement of the center of mass (CM) can be separated from the particles' relative movements under certain conditions. This separation is possible when the potential energy can be divided into components that depend solely on interparticle distances and the CM position. External forces acting uniformly on each particle are also necessary for this separation. The discussion raises questions about whether energy can be transferred between the CM and the particles' degrees of freedom, but the consensus is that they can be treated independently under the right assumptions. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of bound systems.
ORF
Messages
169
Reaction score
18
Hello

If we have a system of several particles bound between them, we often separate the movement of CM from the degrees of freedom of the bound system.

Is the degree of freedom of the CM linked to other degrees of freedom of the bound system?
Equivalent questions: can we unbound (untie, unfasten, set free) the particles by giving* energy to the CM?, or vice versa, can we bound "stronger" by draining energy from the degrees of freedom to CM]?

*I don't know what verb is used instead of give; maybe "convey" would be a more specific word.

My mother language is not English, please forgive any mistake.

Thank you for your time :)

Greetings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ORF said:
Is the degree of freedom of the CM linked to other degrees of freedom of the bound system?

No, for some quite general assumptions, you can separate the movement of the CM from the movement of the particles relative to the CM.
 
Hi!

Thank you for answering so quickly.

What assumptions allow separate the movement of the CM from the movement of the particles relative to the CM?

Greetings :)
 
Essentially it is sufficient that you can split the potential energy into two parts, one that only depends on the interparticle distances, and one that depends only on the CM position. Both may also depend on time, but the interparticle potential changing with time may lead to the system becoming unbound (but still describable separating the CM coordiantes).

This is equivalent to requiring that any external forces acts on each particle with a force proportional to its mass (i.e., giving each particle the same acceleration).
 
Hello

But... that is a tautology, isn't? [except for the detail of potential depending only on the distance and not on its derivatives]

Thank you for your time :)

Greetings
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top