Question about earth's magnetic field strength

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the strength of Earth's magnetic field and how it varies with depth, exploring theoretical calculations and the applicability of different laws of physics in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether Earth's magnetic field strength increases with depth.
  • Another participant suggests that the field strength likely increases with depth, referencing the inverse cube law as applicable when moving away from the Earth.
  • A different participant expresses interest in calculating the field strength near the Earth's core.
  • One participant discusses the applicability of the inverse cube law and inverse square law, noting that at close distances to the Earth and away from the equator, the influence of one magnetic pole becomes more significant than the other.
  • This participant proposes that a more accurate prediction would involve a combination of both laws, depending on proximity to the core and distance from the equator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of Earth's magnetic field strength with depth, with no consensus reached on the applicability of the laws discussed or the calculations proposed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the measurements of magnetic field strength underground and the specific conditions under which the inverse cube and inverse square laws apply.

nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Does Earth's magnetic field strength increase with depth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know of any measurements being taken udnerground, but I would haev to say "yes," because we do know that the field strength decreases as one moves away from the Earth (by the universe cube law).
 
Interesting.. how could you calculate the field strength near the Earth's core?
 
Last edited:
The nivese cube law wul cotninue to be aplicable at the equator, but close to Earth and far from the equator the inverse square is the rule.

Maybe I should explain that a bit further;
When you're close to the Earth and far from the equator, only one ole is imortant, and the influence from the other pole is negligable (not zero, but small enough). When you're far from the Earth, the difference in distance between one pole and the other is less significant. When dealing with only one pole, the power drops off by the inverse square of the distance, and when dealing with both, it's the inverse cube. Of course, in reality, the accurate prediction would be one that incorperates both formuli to find a value somewhere in between, depending on how close to the core you are and how far from the equator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K