Question about electric potential energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric potential energy, particularly in the context of how it is defined and understood in relation to source and test charges. Participants explore the implications of placing a positive test charge near a negative source charge and the resulting electric potential energy values, as well as the distinction between electric potential and electric potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why electric potential energy is high when a positive test charge is placed near a negative source charge, questioning the relationship between work done and distance moved.
  • Another participant explains that electric potential energy is a signed value that is relative to a point of reference, noting that a positive charge in a negative field results in negative potential energy.
  • A similar viewpoint is reiterated, emphasizing that potential energy becomes more negative as the positive charge approaches the negative source charge, and that this reflects the conservation of energy.
  • A participant points out the distinction between electric potential and electric potential energy, suggesting that this difference is crucial to understanding the discussion.
  • A later reply reinforces the idea that the reference point for potential energy is typically at infinite separation, and that work must be done to separate like charges, contrasting this with the attraction between opposite charges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the signed nature of electric potential energy and its dependence on reference points, but there remains confusion and differing interpretations regarding the implications of negative potential energy and the relationship between work and distance in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of electric potential and electric potential energy, as well as the implications of negative potential energy in practical scenarios.

fahad12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
basically i don't understand the basic main idea of electric potential energy.
since by definition, energy is ability to do work( to move an object across a distance).
Negative source charge creates a uniform field around itself, and we place a positive test charge very near the source charge. why the electric potential energy so high? this confuses me because the test charge would just stick to source charge and do very little work.
Now for instance image same test charge is place at 10 times farther than its previous location. electric potential energy is very small as r is increase but the test charge did more work because it has moved a greater distance.
also please provide the main idea about electric potential energy
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The confusing part is electric potential energy is a signed value (positive or negative) and it's not absolute but relative to some point of reference.

For a negative source, the field is considerd negative. For a positve charge in a negative field, the potential energy is a negative value. That would mean that potential energy at a point near the negative source charge would be more negative than a point farther away. If the positive charge was accelerating towards the negative plate (and you ignore issue related to the moving positive charge and the field it generates, and this was in a vacuum), then it's kinetic energy increases, and it's potential energy decreases by becoming more negative.

Note that gravitational potential energy is handled in the same way. For large distances, a common convention is to define a reference point at infinite distance from the gravitational source as zero potential energy, in which case gravitational potential energy becomes increasingly negative as you approach the center of the gravitational source.
 
rcgldr said:
The confusing part is electric potential energy is a signed value (positive or negative) and it's not absolute but relative to some point of reference.

For a negative source, the field is considerd negative. For a positve charge in a negative field, the potential energy is a negative value. That would mean that potential energy at a point near the negative source charge would be more negative than a point farther away. If the positive charge was accelerating towards the negative plate (and you ignore issue related to the moving positive charge and the field it generates, and this was in a vacuum), then it's kinetic energy increases, and it's potential energy decreases by becoming more negative.

Note that gravitational potential energy is handled in the same way. For large distances, a common convention is to define a reference point at infinite distance from the gravitational source as zero potential energy, in which case gravitational potential energy becomes increasingly negative as you approach the center of the gravitational source.
this means that the conservatin of energy holds here. But what doesn't more negative electric potential signifies.
thanks for your concise response
 
Hold on, did you know there is a difference between Electric Potential and Electric Potential Energy?
 
Good catch, Drakkith.
 
Negative source charge creates a uniform field around itself, and we place a positive test charge very near the source charge. why the electric potential energy so high? this confuses me because the test charge would just stick to source charge and do very little work.

Let's start with the definition first:

The reference zero for potential energy is usually at infinite separation and particles are at rest. The electric potential energy of a system is relative to this zero and positive work must be done to bring like (opposing) charges together. [You could define this other ways but this is the agreed upon convention.]

As Post#2 notes, gravitational potential energy is handled the same way.

Placing a positive charge near a negative charge, where the attraction becomes stronger, is of opposite sign to placing two charges of the same sign together, right?

In your example, placing a positive charge near a negative charge, means potential energy is negative...the forces are attractive...you have to do work to keep the charges separated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K