Entropy Change in Free Expansion: Why △S=ncᵥln(T_f/T_i)+nRln(V_f/V_i)?

Click For Summary
In a free expansion, the equation dS=dQ/T cannot be applied, leading to the use of dS>dQ/T instead. The entropy change can still be calculated using the equation △S=ncᵥln(T_f/T_i)+nRln(V_f/V_i) because entropy is a state function, which means it is independent of the path taken to reach the final state. To determine the entropy change for irreversible processes, a reversible process is designed that connects the same initial and final equilibrium states. The validity of this approach relies on the initial and final states being equilibrium states. Thus, the method for calculating entropy change remains applicable despite the irreversibility of the actual process.
spideyjj
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In a free expansion, I know that we cannot use the equation dS=dQ/T...(1). Instead we use dS>dQ/T...(2).

The question is that why we can use △S=ncᵥln(T_f/T_i)+nRln(V_f/V_i) , which is derived from the equation(1), to calculate the entropy change? Shouldn’t it be a inequality too?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Entropy is a state function and doesn’t depend on the path by which the system arrived at its present state. The entropy change on going from an initial state to a final state is thus independent of how the final state is arrived at. To calculate the entropy change dS for an irreversible process, one generally designs a reversible process - linking the same two endpoints - by means of which dS can be calculated using dS = δQrev/T.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Lord Jestocost said:
Entropy is a state function and doesn’t depend on the path by which the system arrived at its present state. The entropy change on going from an initial state to a final state is thus independent of how the final state is arrived at. To calculate the entropy change dS for an irreversible process, one generally designs a reversible process - linking the same two endpoints - by means of which dS can be calculated using dS = δQrev/T.
I would add that the designed reversible process does not need to bear any resemblance whatsoever to the actual irreversible process, except insofar as matching the initial and final thermodynamic equilibrium states.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Don't the beginning and ending states have to be equilibrium states for the scheme described in Posts #2 and #3 to be valid ways of finding the change in entropy?
 
Mister T said:
Don't the beginning and ending states have to be equilibrium states for the scheme described in Posts #2 and #3 to be valid ways of finding the change in entropy?
Isn't that what I said?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
553
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K