Is Exponents Multiplication or Repeated Multiplication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Embison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of exponents, specifically whether they represent multiplication or repeated multiplication. It clarifies that "2 to the power of 4" means multiplying 2 by itself four times, resulting in 16, and emphasizes counting the factors of 2 used in the expression. There is also a debate about the expression x^0 equating to 1, with explanations involving limits as x approaches 0. Participants highlight the importance of maintaining topic relevance and suggest starting new threads for unrelated questions. The conversation underscores the nuances of mathematical language and the definitions of base and power in exponentiation.
Embison
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Basic Math & Pre Algebra for Dummies and it says...

"As you can see, the notation 2 to the power of 4 means multiply 2 by itself 4 times."

and this is written there...2 to the power of 4 = 2 X 2 X 2 X 2 = 16


Isn't that multiplied 3 times? 2 X 2 = 4 that's once. then 4 X 2 = 8 that's twice. then 8 X 2 = 16 that's three times.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have some trouble with language and wording. The exponent indicates the count of a number as a factor in a term.

"Two to the power of Four", "2 to the power of 4", means 2*2*2*2 = 16.
COUNT the factors of 2. How many factors of 2 are used? The expression uses 4 factors of 2. The exponent is 4.
 
2^4 means 2 multiplied with itself 4 times.

2 is called the base

4 is called the power


but..x^0 = 1 implies that x ≠ 0 ..why?
proof?
 
özgürden said:
2^4 means 2 multiplied with itself 4 times.

2 is called the base

4 is called the power


but..x^0 = 1 implies that x ≠ 0 ..why?
proof?
PLEASE do not add your own question to someone else's thread! Start your own thread.

0x= 0 for any positive x. But x0= 1. That is, the limit as x approaches 0 of 0x is 0 while the limit, as x approaches 0 of x0 is 1. In order to have a continuous function we would want to define the value to be such a limit. Since those two limits both "represent" 00, but are different, 00 has no value.
 
HallsofIvy said:
PLEASE do not add your own question to someone else's thread! Start your own thread.

0x= 0 for any positive x. But x0= 1. That is, the limit as x approaches 0 of 0x is 0 while the limit, as x approaches 0 of x0 is 1. In order to have a continuous function we would want to define the value to be such a limit. Since those two limits both "represent" 00, but are different, 00 has no value.

i would agree that this should be in another thread, but I'm not going to start it.

Halls, because

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} x^x = 1

i think most people agree that, if you were going to assign a value of 00 to anything, it would be 1. heck, (0.000000001)0.000000001 is a lot closer to 1 than it is to 0.
 
Hi Embison! :smile:
Embison said:
I'm reading Basic Math & Pre Algebra for Dummies and it says...

"As you can see, the notation 2 to the power of 4 means multiply 2 by itself 4 times."

and this is written there...2 to the power of 4 = 2 X 2 X 2 X 2 = 16


Isn't that multiplied 3 times? 2 X 2 = 4 that's once. then 4 X 2 = 8 that's twice. then 8 X 2 = 16 that's three times.

Yup … I agree with you! :biggrin:

But it's ok in that book …

:smile: 'cos dummies won't notice! :smile:
 
But this is only if the exponent and base is approaching zero at the same rate. In fact, \lim_{x \to 0} \lim_{y \to 0} x^{y} can take any value, depending on the "speed" the two variables are approaching zero with.
 
HallsofIvy said:
PLEASE do not add your own question to someone else's thread! Start your own thread.

.
pardon..
 
Back
Top