Question about Formulae for Motion in a Rotating Reference Frame

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the equations for velocity and acceleration in a rotating reference frame, specifically for a particle moving in a circular groove on a rotating square plate. Key terms are defined, including the position vector from the origin to the particle and the angular velocities involved. The participant analyzes the velocity equation, breaking down its components, including the Coriolis term and centripetal acceleration. There is confusion about whether the problem is framed in a rotating or non-rotating reference frame, with the conclusion leaning towards a non-rotating frame due to the nature of the forces acting on the particle. Clarification on these terms and their interpretations is sought to better grasp the dynamics involved.
Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Homework Statement
Particle P moves in a circular groove with radius ## a ## which has been cut into a square plate with sides of length ## l ##. The plate rotates about its corner ## O ## with with angular velocity ## \omega \hat k ## and angular acceleration ## \dot \omega \hat k ##. Particle P rotates about the centre of the circular groove (which coincides with the centre of the square plate) with with angular velocity ## \alpha \hat k ## and angular acceleration ## \dot \alpha \hat k ##
Relevant Equations
## \ddot r = \ddot R + \ddot \rho + \omega \times \omega \times \rho + 2 \omega \times \rho ##
Hi,

I am reading the following question: "Particle P moves in a circular groove with radius ## a ## which has been cut into a square plate with sides of length ## l ##. The plate rotates about its corner ## O ## with with angular velocity ## \omega \hat k ## and angular acceleration ## \dot \omega \hat k ##. Particle P rotates about the centre of the circular groove (which coincides with the centre of the square plate) with with angular velocity ## \alpha \hat k ## and angular acceleration ## \dot \alpha \hat k ##"

I am just trying to understand what the terms in these equations for velocity and acceleration in a rotating reference frame mean. ## \vec R ## is defined to be the vector from some origin ## O ## to some point ## o ##, ## \vec \omega ## is defined to be the angular velocity of ## o ## about O, and ## \rho ## is defined to to be a vector from ## o ## to some point P. ## \vec r ## is defined to point from O to P.

My attempt:
First to start with the velocity equation (generic formula, terms aren't related to problem)
## \dot r_p = \dot R + \dot \rho + (\omega \times \rho) ##

This is what I think the terms are:
- ## \dot R ##: this will include the ## \omega_{O} \times r_{O/A} = \omega \hat k \times \frac{l \sqrt 2}{2} \hat j = \frac{- \omega l \sqrt 2}{2} \hat i ## term
- ## \dot \rho ##: this will include the ## \omega_{P/o} \times r_{P/o} = \alpha \hat k \times a \hat i = \alpha a \hat j ##
- ## \omega \times \rho ## term which will equal ## \omega_{O} \times r_{P/o} = \omega \hat k \times a \hat i = \omega a \hat j ##

I can understand what the first two terms are, but what is the third term? Originally I thought that ## \dot \rho ## would correspond to changes in the radius (which is fixed in this case and thus would be 0) and the ## \omega \times \rho ## would be what I have denoted ## \dot \rho ## as.

Now to consider the acceleration equation (once again the symbols are just generic and bear no relation to variable names in the problem)
## \ddot r_p = \ddot R + \ddot \rho + (\omega \times \omega \times \rho) + 2 \omega \times \dot \rho + (\dot \omega \times \rho) ##

- Coriolis term: ## 2 \omega \times \dot \rho = 2 \omega_{O} \times \dot \rho ## where ## \dot \rho ## was found above
- The ## (\omega \times \omega \times \rho) ## term. At first I thought this was centripetal of P relative to o, but the answer seems to denote it as a centripetal term relative to O: ## \omega_{O} \times \omega_{O} \times a ## (have dropped the vector directions for simplicity).
- The ## \ddot \rho ## term which includes the centripetal acceleration of P about o ## \alpha ^ 2 a ## and the tangential acceleration of P about o ## a \dot \alpha ##.
- ## \ddot R ##: which will include the centripetal acceleration of o around O and the tangential term ## \omega_{O} ^ 2 \frac{l \sqrt 2}{2} ##
- ## \dot \omega \times \rho = \dot \omega_{O} \times a ##

Are those correct interpretations of those terms?

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Master1022 said:
I am just trying to understand what the terms in these equations for velocity and acceleration in a rotating reference frame mean.
Is the problem even using a rotating frame? It looks to me like they are using a non-rotating frame, and the angular velocities and accelerations given are relative to that non-rotating frame.
 
To me it looks like the particle is constrained to move in a circular groove cut into a square plate of side ##l##. The square plate has angular acceleration about one of its corners. So in addition to the contact forces exerted by the groove, the particle is subjected to the inertial forces in the plate's rotating frame.

The particle's angular velocity ##\alpha## (poor choice of symbol if you ask me) and angular acceleration ##\dot{\alpha}## are given relative to the center of the groove which is at distance ##\frac{l}{\sqrt{2}}## from the axis of rotation of the plate.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
775
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
884
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K