Question about Lagrangean dynamics(inertia matrix)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova1387
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formulation of equations of motion for a 3-degree-of-freedom system using Lagrangian dynamics, specifically addressing the inertia matrix, Coriolis-centrifugal matrix, and potential matrix. The user questions the consistency of units within the inertia matrix, noting that the first two equations yield units of kg(m/s)2 while the third yields kg(m/s2). Responses clarify that it is acceptable to have variables with different units as long as the matrices remain consistent and symmetric. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining symmetry in the inertia matrix while also allowing for dimensional analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian dynamics and equations of motion
  • Familiarity with inertia matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of Coriolis-centrifugal forces in multi-degree-of-freedom systems
  • Basic principles of dimensional analysis in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formulation of mass and stiffness matrices for cantilever beams using both mechanics of materials and Lagrangian methods
  • Study the properties and applications of symmetric matrices in dynamics
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the implications of mixed units in multi-variable systems
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, researchers in dynamics, and students studying Lagrangian mechanics who are working with multi-degree-of-freedom systems and require a deeper understanding of inertia matrices and their applications.

supernova1387
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a 3 degree of freedom system and my equation of motion is like this:

M(q)q_dd + C(q,q_d)q_d+G(q)=0

M(q): inertia matrix
C(q,q_d): Coriolis-centrifugal matrix
G(q): potential matrix.

where q_d is the first derivative of q etc and q is a vector of my variables.

q=[θ,γ,a]T

"θ" and "γ" are angles in (rad) and "a" is length in (m).

Now my question is this: I have 3 equations with 3 unknowns but 2 variables are in terms of angles and 1 in terms of distance, so the elements of my inertia matrix don't have the same units. Is that wrong? I mean each equation is consistent in units. The first 2 have units of kg(m/s)^2 while the 3rd has units of kg(m/s^2). I can make the whole thing dimensionless but I read somewhere that the inertia matrix should be symmetric(which it is symmetric at the moment). If I make my equation of motion dimensionless then inertia matrix won't be symmetric anymore. What shall I do?

Any suggestions are welcome

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's perfectly OK to have variables in different units. Just go with the consistent and symmetric matrices.

If you want to see a fully worked out example of this sort of thing, Google for the the formulation for the mass and stiffness of a cantilever beam with displacement and rotation variables at each end. You should be able to find it worked out both by "mechanics of materials" and Lagrangian methods, and of course both will give the same matrices if all the other assumptions about the system are the same.
 
AlephZero said:
It's perfectly OK to have variables in different units. Just go with the consistent and symmetric matrices.

If you want to see a fully worked out example of this sort of thing, Google for the the formulation for the mass and stiffness of a cantilever beam with displacement and rotation variables at each end. You should be able to find it worked out both by "mechanics of materials" and Lagrangian methods, and of course both will give the same matrices if all the other assumptions about the system are the same.

Thank you for your reply. I think this will happen whenever one variable is measuring displacement while the other is measuring rotation even for 2 DOF systems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K