Question about radioactive fallout

  • Thread starter Thread starter F Gump
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactive
AI Thread Summary
World War II collectibles from Japan, such as uniforms and weapons, are not likely to be radioactive if they were not in close proximity to ground zero during the bombings. The majority of radioactivity from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings has decayed significantly, and current levels are indistinguishable from background radiation. Fallout primarily affected specific areas, and most materials did not become radioactive due to the nature of the bomb's explosion. Even items that were in Japan after the bombings would not retain harmful levels of radiation. Therefore, WWII collectibles from Japan are considered safe and not radiologically contaminated.
F Gump
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My uncle was in WWII, and after we bombed japan , he was send over there for some duty. When he came home he brought some belongings from japan, like his uniform, Gun,, ETC...He passed away this year and left some of his WWII things to me that he brought back from japan. My question is, IF these things were in japan after we droped the bomb, would they have residual radioactive dust still on them, in other words arent WWII collectibles from japan radilogicly contaminated? Thank you for any help, as i don't know much about how fall out all works.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
F Gump said:
My question is, IF these things were in japan after we droped the bomb, would they have residual radioactive dust still on them, in other words arent WWII collectibles from japan radilogicly contaminated?
Unless he physically rolled around in the dirt near ground-zero in one of those two cities, no (and even if he did, probably not).

Some info http://www.hiroshima-is.ac.jp/Hiroshima/radiation.htm .
Question 11. Are Hiroshima and Nagasaki still radioactive?

No. There are two ways radioactivity is produced from an atomic blast. The first is due to fallout of the fission products or the nuclear material itself, i.e., uranium or plutonium that contaminate the ground. (The same ground contamination occurred as a consequence of the Chernobyl accident.) The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs exploded at 500 to 600 m of altitude, then formed huge fireballs that rose with ascending air currents. Subsequently, the material cooled down and started to fall with rain. Because of the wind, the rain did not fall directly on the hypocenter but rather in the northwest region (Koi, Takasu area) of Hiroshima and the eastern region (Nishiyama area) of Nagasaki. Nowadays, the radioactivity is so miniscule that it is difficult to distinguish from trace amounts of radioactivity caused by atmospheric atomic-bomb tests.

Another way radioactivity is produced is by neutron irradiation of soil or buildings. (Neutrons comprise 10% or less of A-bomb radiation; nonradioactive materials become radioactive after absorbing neutrons. In contrast, gamma rays--which comprise the majority of A-bomb radiation--do not cause ground materials to become radioactive.) However, most of the radioactivity decayed very quickly so that it now takes months to measure the radioactivity using highly sensitive equipment. Despite miniscule levels, these measurements are currently utilized to estimate neutron doses released from the bombs.

In both cases, the residual radioactivity is far less than the dose received from background radiation; hence, there are no detectable effects on human health.
Others may be able to give more...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
F Gump said:
, in other words arent WWII collectibles from japan radilogicly contaminated?

F_Gump,

In a word - NO!

The are a lot of things in your life that are much more radioactive than
Japanese collectables - including YOU.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top