Question about Retarded Time and Moving Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of retarded time in relation to moving charges, specifically questioning whether the distance r should be a function of normal time t or retarded time t'. It clarifies that if the observation point is stationary and the charge is moving, then r should be expressed as r(t'), reflecting the distance at the time the signal was emitted. Additionally, if both the charge and observation point are in motion, the distance must account for both positions, leading to a more complex equation. The final equation presented incorporates the positions of both the charge and observation point relative to a fixed origin. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately applying the concept of retarded time in electromagnetic theory.
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
I have a quick question about the retarded time when dealing with moving charges.

The retarded time is:

t' = t - \frac{r}{c}

where r is the distance between the point of observation and the position of the charge.

My question is very simple, is r a function of the normal time t, or the retarded time t'?

That is, which equation is correct?

1. t' = t - \frac{r(t)}{c}

2. t' = t - \frac{r(t')}{c}

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on which one is moving. If the observation point stays still, and the charge is moving, then you are interested in r(t'), the distance at time the signal was emitted.

More generally, suppose both the charge and observation point are moving, with rc and ro being positions of charge and observation point respectively relative to some fixed origin. In that case, the distance traveled by the wave will be function of both.

t' = t - \frac{||\vec{r}_c(t')-\vec{r}_o(t)||}{c}
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top