Hi, everyone(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm now reading A Relativist's Toolkit by Eric Poisson.

In chapter 3, he say something about stationary and static spacetime.

For static spacetime, it's just like stationary (admits timelike Killing vector [itex] t^{\alpha} [/itex]) with addition that metric should be invariant under time reversal [itex] t \rightarrow -t [/itex]. Which implies in some specific coordinate [itex] g_{t\mu} = 0 [/itex].

He also say that, this also implies that [itex] t_{\alpha} = g_{tt}\partial_{\alpha}t [/itex] and he concludes that "a spacetime is static if the timelike Killing vector field is hypersurface orthogonal".

I'd like to ask about these two implications. I have no idea how these two become relevant with static spacetime. Because, as far as I know, hypersurface orthogonal is the congruence of geodesics which have no rotating part.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question about static spacetime

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**