Question about Taylor Expansions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cpburris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Taylor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Taylor expansion of the function ##\sqrt{1+x^2}## around ##x=0##, specifically extending to the 5th term. A user inquired about the validity of substituting ##y=x^n## to simplify the expansion process. The consensus is that while defining a new function is permissible, one cannot simply re-substitute ##y=x^n## back into the polynomial without accounting for the derivatives' changes. The differentiation and substitution processes do not commute, which complicates the validity of the approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and expansions
  • Familiarity with differentiation and chain rule
  • Knowledge of binomial expansion
  • Basic concepts of calculus involving small parameters
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Taylor series derivation and applications in calculus
  • Learn about binomial expansion and its applications
  • Explore the implications of variable substitution in calculus
  • Investigate the properties of derivatives and their behavior under substitution
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Taylor expansions and variable substitutions.

cpburris
Gold Member
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
I was working out a problem requiring a taylor expansion of ## \sqrt {1+x^2} ## (about ##x=0##). I needed to go out to the 5th term in the expansion, which, while not difficult, was long and annoying as the ##x^2## necessitated chain rules and product rules when taking the derivatives and the number of terms in each derivative just keeps increasing. I was wondering if a function which is strictly dependent on ##x^n## (##x^2## terms but no terms linear in ##x## for example), where ##x## is the small parameter, whether it is permissible to perform a change of variable, say ##y=x^n##, and perform the taylor expansion with respect to ##y## (as ##x## is small, then of course ##x^n## is small). I don't see any problem with doing that, but I wanted to make sure there isn't something I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see a problem either. You basically define a new function and consider that. But why would you want to do this? You evaluate at ##x=0## anyway which makes many terms automatically zero. And you cannot take the ##y-##result and re-substitute ##y=x^n## in the polynomial. This is wrong. In the Taylor series we have terms ##\left. \dfrac{df(x^n)}{dx}\right|_{x=0}=\left. \dfrac{df(y)}{dx}\right|_{x=0} = \left. \dfrac{df(y)}{dy}\right|_{y=y(0)}\cdot \left. \dfrac{dy(x)}{dx}\right|_{x=0}## and you cannot pretend as if the second factor equals ##1##. And the higher the degree, the more factors and sums you get.

It might work in your example with the many zeros, but you cannot say it in general. You can consider the new function, but if you change the variable again, the derivatives are different: differentiation and substitution do not commute.
 
Since ##\sqrt{1+x^2}=(1+x^2)^\frac{1}{2}##, binomial expansion can be used ##(1+x^2)^\frac{1}{2}=1+\frac{1}{2}x^2+\frac{(1/2)(-1/2)}{2!}x^4+⋯+\frac{(1/2)(-1/2)...(-(2k-3))/2)}{k!})x^{2k}+⋯##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K