Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question about the Nyquist sampling rate

  1. Mar 5, 2015 #1
    I'm trying to look up sources on the nyquist sampling rate, but I keep finding this small subtle difference between sources, and I am not sure if it is laziness or some subtle point I am missing.

    Sometimes I see the nyquist rate as Fs>2Fm and sometimes I see it as Fs>=2Fm. So is it the sampling rate is any frequency equal or greater than two times the max frequency, or does the sampling frequency have to be greater than two times the signal's max frequency? Or is there some subtlety that I am missing in the articles I am reading, and under some circumstances it is equal to or greater and others it has to be greater.

    I feel like I am finding online sources that write it one way and some write it the other way, and I just want to make sure my understanding is exact. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 5, 2015 #2
    It's a strict inequality, since, if you take the classic example of a sine wave sampled at exactly twice its frequency, you could have the two samples per period lie on the zero crossings, and you can't reconstruct the original signal from a sequence of zeros. In practice, however, you'd typically sample at a much higher frequency than dictated by this inequality.

    You can get away with sampling below the Nyquist rate for a signal, by exploiting aliasing, if it has both a lower and upper frequency bound for its content (sometimes called a passband signal).

    As a sidenote: Be careful about using 'Nyquist frequency' and 'Nyquist rate' interchangeably. There can be a difference depending on context.
     
  4. Mar 5, 2015 #3
    Thank you very much for the information, that clears everything up.
     
  5. Mar 5, 2015 #4

    Baluncore

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Shannon's sampling theorem says sample at twice the highest frequency present in the signal.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem
    Nyquist had little to do with it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem#Why_Nyquist.3F
     
  6. Mar 6, 2015 #5
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Question about the Nyquist sampling rate
  1. Nyquist Sampling Rate (Replies: 5)

Loading...