Question about the power rating of a transformer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the power rating of transformers in aerospace applications, particularly focusing on the challenges of weight and the potential benefits of using high current density wires and high frequency AC. Participants explore the implications of these factors on transformer design and efficiency in the context of electric-powered aircraft.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that high current density wires could improve the power-to-weight ratio of transformers, similar to their application in electric motors.
  • Others note that using higher frequencies, such as 400 Hz, can reduce the size and weight of transformers by decreasing the amount of iron needed and the number of wire turns required.
  • There is a discussion about the use of oscillators to convert battery DC to high frequency AC, which is deemed necessary for achieving high voltage levels in battery-powered aerospace applications.
  • Some participants mention the possibility of using air-cored transformers to further reduce weight, as opposed to traditional ferrite cores.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of scaling technologies like brushless DC motors and inverters for larger applications.
  • Participants discuss the historical context of AC power systems in aircraft and the evolution of technologies used for DC to AC conversion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the best approaches to transformer design and the use of high frequency AC versus DC. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the optimal solution for the challenges presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the feasibility of high frequency AC in practical applications and the dependence on specific design requirements for aerospace applications. The discussion also highlights unresolved questions regarding the scalability of certain technologies.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to aerospace engineers, electrical engineers, and researchers focused on power systems, particularly in the context of electric aircraft and lightweight transformer design.

RobertGC
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
In some aerospace applications you need high voltages in the range of kilovolts. This is commonly supplied by transformers. However, transformers because of their iron cores are heavy. But in aerospace being lightweight is a key requirement.

In the thread "Question about power capacity of electrical motors", I noted that high current density wires could improve the power to weight ratio of electric motors.

The same question pertains to transformers: could high current density wires improve the power level rating of transformers in relation to their weight?

Bob Clark
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Aircraft AC power systems often use 400 Hz because that makes the transformers smaller and lighter.

Frequency is another degree of freedom you can adjust.

Also remember that higher voltages means lower currents for the same power. Therefore ideas that improve the conductivity of wires is more important at low voltages than high voltages.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RobertGC and Asymptotic
RobertGC said:
The same question pertains to transformers: could high current density wires improve the power level rating of transformers in relation to their weight?

Well, sure . It takes less core to encircle small wires than large ones.

RobertGC said:
But in aerospace being lightweight is a key requirement.
Back to basics:
By raising frequency you lessen the amount of iron you need to achieve given dΦ/dt,
as well as the number of turns of wire you need to wrap around that iron to achieve desired voltage..
One can combine those two effects to arrive at a practical design.
anorlunda said:
Aircraft AC power systems often use 400 Hz because that makes the transformers smaller and lighter.

As anorlunda observed 400 hz aircraft electrical dates back to at least WW2.
Next logical step was high frequency Switch Mode Power Supply .
Look at the toroid in your PC power supply - better part of a kilowatt through something smaller than a plum?
I remember my amazement at first one i ever saw about 1973.

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RobertGC, Asymptotic and cnh1995
How is high frequency AC obtained from battery DC?

Bob Clark
 
RobertGC said:
How is high frequency AC obtained from battery DC?

Bob Clark
At the heart of it is an oscillator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RobertGC
RobertGC said:
How is high frequency AC obtained from battery DC?
Are you asking about WW2 airplanes ? A DC motor runs an AC generator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
jim hardy said:
Are you asking about WW2 airplanes ? A DC motor runs an AC generator.

I'm really asking in the context of electric powered airplanes, which are intended to run on batteries. No gasoline engine.

Bob Clark
 
RobertGC said:
I'm really asking in the context of electric powered airplanes, which are intended to run on batteries. No gasoline engine.

Bob Clark
As an example, here's a motor speed controller for drones and RC planes. No inductors at all. It just switches DC on/off to a three-phase Brush-less DC motor. Not sure if that tech scales up for larger motors or not (I think it does, I read a Tesla blog where they compared BLDC to their induction motor, and it wasn't any slam dunk, they both have pros/cons).

https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infin...N.pdf?fileId=5546d462580663ef015843a229fe54ea
 
  • #10
jim hardy said:
Are you asking about WW2 airplanes ? A DC motor runs an AC generator.

Let me add some clarity. We need thousands of volts for a certain aerospace application that is battery powered. This would normally be done by transformers, to ramp up the battery voltage but transformers have heavy ferrite cores whose weight is precluded in this application. (It needs to be highly weight optimized.)
According to Jim Hardy we can reduce the size of the core by using high frequency AC. Ideally the transformer would even be air-cored with no ferrite core at all.

Bob Clark
 
  • #11
Asymptotic said:
At the heart of it is an oscillator.
Thanks for that. The oscillator being electronic would be in keeping with our application since modern electronics are normally lightweight.

Bob Clark
 
Last edited:
  • #12
You don't have to invent it yourself. DC to AC conversion is called an "inverter." Plenty of them are available commecially.

Small ones, like this cigarette lighter inverter could be scavenged for just the parts needed in a light weight drone. The schematic is below.

But why have AC at all? Sticking with DC requires zero size or weight for an inverter.
bait-car-power-inverter-car-spy-camera-great-for-bait-cars-ef8.jpg

60W-inverter-using-transitors.png
 
  • #13
RobertGC said:
Let me add some clarity. We need thousands of volts for a certain aerospace application that is battery powered.

Hmm a radiation detector of some sort ?
Low current ?
For a look at a practical battery powered step up converter get a disposable film camera and look at the flash unit with its bean sized toroid.. Be careful taking it apart though, the flash capacitor is usually charged to a couple hundred volts.

Victoreen used to be a friendly company. I've been to their factory and they were practical folks.
If your project is radiation measurement it might be worth giving them a look.

old jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
25K