High School Question about the validity of Coefficient of Restitution

Tyrone Sawyer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Specifically as to the validity of CoR as a metric for the bounciness of an object. CoR is inherently a property of /two/ objects, say, the interaction between rubber and steel. Is it truly the case that given two objects, it's impossible to say that one object is bouncier than another? This is a topic for which I really can't find many people talking, likely because it's boring, useless, but also sort of easy.

My intuition tells me that if you have two objects, and two surfaces, than if object A bounces better than object B on surface C, than it should bounce better on surface D as well. Further, it should bounce better on /all/ surfaces.

My understanding is that CoR is really a very rough approximation of a whole bunch of chaotic interplay between systems, but my intuition strongly tells me that there should be a notion of bounciness; even if it can't necessarily be used to trace back to CoR without complex formulae, whatever those formulae are, they should be monotone increasing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tyrone Sawyer said:
Specifically as to the validity of CoR as a metric for the bounciness of an object. CoR is inherently a property of /two/ objects, say, the interaction between rubber and steel. Is it truly the case that given two objects, it's impossible to say that one object is bouncier than another? This is a topic for which I really can't find many people talking, likely because it's boring, useless, but also sort of easy.

My intuition tells me that if you have two objects, and two surfaces, than if object A bounces better than object B on surface C, than it should bounce better on surface D as well. Further, it should bounce better on /all/ surfaces.

My understanding is that CoR is really a very rough approximation of a whole bunch of chaotic interplay between systems, but my intuition strongly tells me that there should be a notion of bounciness; even if it can't necessarily be used to trace back to CoR without complex formulae, whatever those formulae are, they should be monotone increasing.
Think of each object as an imperfect spring. That is, each has two spring constants: a larger one during deformation (compression in this case) and a smaller one during relaxation (decompression).
See if you can derive the CoR for the combination in terms of those four constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
107K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K