Question about work energy theorem

AI Thread Summary
The work-energy theorem states that the net work done on an object is equal to its change in kinetic energy. When walking up stairs at constant velocity, the net work done on the entire body is negative due to the opposing force of gravity, while the net work done on the head is zero because the upward force from the neck balances the downward force of gravity. The confusion arises because the net work on the body as a whole does not account for the individual work done on different body parts, especially in non-rigid systems like the human body. Therefore, the center of mass work does not equate to the net work done on all components. Understanding these distinctions clarifies why the answer to the original problem is A.
blueblast
Hello,

I am confused about the work energy theorem.

If someone goes up the stairs at a constant velocity, is work being done on the person? After all, Wnet = change in kinetic energy, and that change is zero.

This is the original problem that I am trying to solve, from David Morin's Problems and Solutions in Introductory Mechanics:

Fill in the blanks: If you walk up some stairs at constant speed, the net work done of your entire body(during some specific time interval) is ______, and the net work done on just your head is ______

a) negative, zero
b) zero, zero
c) zero, positive
d) positive, zero
e) positive, positive

The answer is A, which I do not understand; I thought the change in kinetic energy on the body would be zero, not negative. Why is this? And also, why is the work on the head zero?

Thanks,

blueblast
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blueblast said:
The answer is A, which I do not understand; I thought the change in kinetic energy on the body would be zero, not negative. Why is this? And also, why is the work on the head zero?
The "net work" on the entire body is the sum of two numbers. One is the work being done on the feet by the upward force of the stairs. The other is the work being done on the various body parts by gravity.

The "net work" on the head is the sum of two numbers. One is the work being done on the head by the upward force of the neck. The other is the work being done on the head by gravity.

The "net work" (the sum of the individual works done on each component of the system) is not always equal to the "center of mass work" (net force times center of mass displacement) in the case of rotating or non-rigid bodies. The human body is non-rigid.

The work energy theorem in the form you have invoked it relates the change in kinetic energy of the body as a whole to the center-of-mass work done on that body. Unfortunately, as above, center of mass work is not the same thing as net work.
 
  • Like
Likes blueblast
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top