Question from a noob to the forum regarding current research in Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying promising fields of research in physics that may lead to significant advancements and breakthroughs in the coming decades. Participants explore various theoretical and experimental domains, including string theory, particle physics, cosmology, gravitational wave astronomy, and fusion energy, while expressing interest in both pure and applied physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that string theory, particle physics, and cosmology may be hot spots for future breakthroughs, although they express concern about the empirical verifiability of these theories.
  • Another participant proposes that nanotechnology looks promising for future research opportunities.
  • A different participant highlights the potential of gravitational wave astronomy, contingent on the success of LIGO and LISA, as a new field that could complement general relativity.
  • There is mention of the ITER facility and its potential to revolutionize energy production through fusion power, contingent on its success in developing sustainable fusion reactions.
  • One participant seeks clarification on theoretical ideas in pure physics that are poised for experimental verification, specifically mentioning gravitational waves as an example.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for more information on fusion physics, reflecting on past discouragement regarding the challenges of radioactive waste management.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of viewpoints on which fields may be the most promising for future research, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on a single area of focus, as some prioritize theoretical advancements while others emphasize experimental opportunities.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of experimental data in driving advancements in physics, suggesting that the discussion is influenced by the current state of research and the challenges associated with empirical verification of theoretical concepts.

tiyusufaly
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I would just like some opinion as to which fields of physics are currently looking to be the hottest ones for research and intellectual discovery for the next few decades. Obviously no one can predict for certain, but I would like some thoughts on where the next major advances in Physics knowledge, potentially revolutionary breakthroughs, might occur. I was thinking string theory, particle physics, cosmology, all those theoretical subjects that tie around the unification of forces, the potential TOE, etc... may be the hot spots, but they don't seem like they are going to be very empirically verifiable any time soon.

Opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nanotech looks promising.
 
We're hoping to discover gravitational waves any moment now (LIGO, LISA, etc), and if successful there will be a whole new field "gravitational wave astronomy" to complement general relativity theory.

Similarly, if the ITER facility proves successful, then there will be a huge demand to start building fusion powerplants.

Physics is driven by experiment, so I expect the big advances will usually occur wherever there exists previously unattainable data.
 
cesiumfrog said:
Similarly, if the ITER facility proves successful, then there will be a huge demand to start building fusion powerplants.
Can you please post a link for more info? My intro into fusion physics about a decade ago was pretty discouraging. Especially the part about still needing to handle the radioactive waste. It would be cool if they've figured out how to ignite and sustain the most benign reaction.:!)
 
Okay, sorry to do this, but I think I've kind of narrowed down my question a bit more, so I'd appreciate if people would address this recently altered request:

I am not questioning so much what is major in applied physics. That stuff, nanotech, quantum dots, computers, etc... is very nice, but I'm more interested in pure physics, not its applications.

So what theoretical ideas about pure basic research physics seem like they are capable of getting huge opportunity for experimental verification and support? Like, the gravitational waves was an example of a theoretical topic (curvatures of space time, gravity energy waves) that is on the verge of a revolution in experimental evidence to support it and solidify it.

What other topics in pure basic research of physics are there like that, poised and ready to be verified with experiment over the next few decades?
 
berkeman said:
Can you please post a link for more info? My intro into fusion physics about a decade ago was pretty discouraging. Especially the part about still needing to handle the radioactive waste. It would be cool if they've figured out how to ignite and sustain the most benign reaction.:!)
Well the homepage should be sufficient. http://www.iter.org/
ITER is a European collaboration to make a fusion power plant and try to get ahead of the US. Well, maybe they're already ahead regarding more purely-physics stuff like this. Blast! SSC!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K