Question from Lanczos book - genearlized momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackiefrost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the transition from equation 53.4 to 53.5 in Cornelius Lanczos' "Variational Principles of Mechanics." Equation 53.4 defines generalized momentum as the derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to velocities, while equation 53.5 relates the derivatives of generalized momenta to the derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to positions. This relationship is derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations. By setting the generalized momentum as the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to velocity, the equation simplifies to show that the time derivative of momentum equals the spatial derivative of the Lagrangian. The clarification helps in understanding the mathematical connection between the two equations.
jackiefrost
Messages
140
Reaction score
1
If you have the 4th ed. of Cornelius Lanczos' book on Variational Principles of Mechanics, could you explain to me how he got from eq. 53.4 to 53.5 (page 121). Eq. 53.4 defines the generalized momentum as the derivative of the Lagrangian, L, with respect to the velocities. Then, in eq. 53.5 he refers to the derivatives of the generalized momenta as equaling the derivative of L with respect to the positions. Is this right? This seems so simple yet for some reason (or lack thereof :blushing:) I'm not seeing the math from 53.4 to 53.5.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think everyone has this book, so could you please write down the equations that he mentions?
 
It follows from the Euler-Lagrange equations:

\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial{\mathcal{L}}}{\partial v_{\alpha}} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x_{\alpha}} .​

Setting p_{\alpha} = {\partial{\mathcal{L}}}/{\partial v_{\alpha}} in this, you get
\frac{d p_{\alpha} }{dt} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x_{\alpha}} .​
 
Last edited:
Thanks dx! Don't know why I didn't seen that.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top