I Question on §3 of Einstein's 1905 paper

Brett Oertel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

This is my first time posting on PF!

I have a question on §3 of Einstein's paper "On the electrodynamics of moving bodies."My problem is with the following mathematical statements:

img22.gif


Hence, if x' is chosen to be infinitesimally small,

img23.gif


or

img24.gif
I have just finished high school, and whilst I have finished two other books which concerned Special Relativity (and understood them well) I think I do not know enough maths to understand what i pasted above. Could someone explain how he gets from step 1 to step 2 please?
Or, perhaps could someone tell me what topics in calculus I must learn in order to understand it myself?

Thanks!

EDIT: I found many other threads asking the exact same thing as me... Oops! I managed to derive it on my own so no answer is necessary :).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Brett Oertel said:
Oops! I managed to derive it on my own so no answer is necessary :).

Mind posting the derivation so others can see how it was done?
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

Possible to publish a paper that contradicts Einstein's special relativity?
2
Replies
82
Views
7K
A Electrodynamics of moving bodies - §2: On the relativity of... (again)
Replies
35
Views
4K
I A problem in the equations for Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
I What if one is in 1905 and debating foundational fundamentals?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Understanding Einstein's second postulate of special relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
B Historic question regarding SR and c*t
Replies
12
Views
2K
B Synchronization free of Contradiction: 1905 Paper
Replies
23
Views
2K
B Special Relativity & Einstein's Equivalence Principle
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Co- and Contravariance
Replies
5
Views
1K
I How does Einstein define simultaneity in his 1905 paper?
2
Replies
62
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top