Question on a sinodal charge distribution regarding retarded potential.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the retarded scalar potential V at the origin from a spinning plastic circular ring with a line charge density defined as λ = λ₀ |sin(θ/2)|. The key formula used is V(𝑟,𝑡) = (λ₀ / 4πε₀) ∫(0 to 2π) |sin((φ - ωtₗ)/2)| dφ, where θ is defined as θ = φ - ωtₗ. The user, Alan, questions the limits of integration for φ and θ, noting that conventional substitution alters these limits. Ultimately, Alan resolves his initial query but seeks further clarification on a new question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of retarded potentials in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with line charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its implications in physics
  • Proficiency in integral calculus, particularly in evaluating definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of retarded potentials in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the implications of angular velocity on charge distributions
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of sine functions in integration
  • Learn about the application of substitution methods in definite integrals
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in charge distributions and potential calculations.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
The example is about finding the retarded scalar potential V at the origin from a plastic circular ring on xy plane center at origin spining at constant angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex] with line charge density: [tex]\lambda = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right |[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> For finding retarded potential at the origin,<br /> [tex]\hbox { Let }\; \theta = \phi - \omega t_r[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]\lambda_{(\phi,t_r)} = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right | = \lambda_0\left | sin \left (\frac {\phi -\omega t_r}{2}\right ) \right |[/tex]<br /> <br /> Where [tex]V_{(\vec r,t)} = \frac 1 {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int \frac {\lambda_{(\phi,t_r)}}{a} dl' = \frac {\lambda_0} {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int_0^{2\pi} \frac {\left |sin \left (\frac {\phi - \omega t_r}{2}\right ) \right | }{a} ad\phi = \frac {\lambda_0} {4\pi \epsilon_0}\int_0^{2\pi} \left |sin \left (\frac {\theta}{2}\right ) \right | d\theta[/tex]<br /> <br /> Notice the limit of the two integration still the same? My question is the book claim both [itex]\phi \;\hbox { and }\; \theta[/itex] are 0 to [itex]2\pi[/itex]. But if you do the convensional substitution:<br /> <br /> [tex]\phi = 0 \Rightarrow \theta =-\frac { \omega t_r}{2} \hbox { and } \;\phi = 2\pi \Rightarrow \theta = 2\pi-\frac { \omega t_r}{2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> This will change the limit. Please explain why I can do that.<br /> <br /> Thanks<br /> <br /> Alan[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I figure out my original question. But I have a totally different question. I modified the original post #1. Please take a look and help me.

Thanks

Alan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K