MHB Question on Isolating Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duckfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Duckfan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I was doing this last week and now I'm drawing blanks on an equation with 2 variables.

When you have a constant and a variable + a variable by itself, I forgot if I'm supposed to try to cancel the individual variable, or if I'm supposed to multiply/add it as a "like term".

I'm not giving equation yet (unless you really want me to) since I'm trying to solve this myself. And I'm beating up on myself too since I want to remember how to solve this. I'm just not remembering something as to what I isolate. I understand the rule on what you do on left side, you do on other. But the fact that I have 2 variables is confusing me-as to canceling the individual variable, or include it with the other term since it may be considered a like term.
Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you mean something like ax+ x, that is equal to (a+ 1)x and you can treat a+ 1 as a single constant.
 
HallsofIvy said:
If you mean something like ax+ x, that is equal to (a+ 1)x and you can treat a+ 1 as a single constant.

So if I had an equation or part of one eg, 3x - x, it would be 2x?
 
Yes. 3x - x = x + x + x - x = x + x = 2x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top