Question on Witten's paper: Perturbative Gauge Theory As A String Theory

earth2
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Question on Witten's paper: "Perturbative Gauge Theory As A String Theory..."

Hi guys,

I have a question regarding formula 2.12 of Witten's paper hep-th/0312171
"Perturbative Gauge Theory As A String Theory In Twistor Space". He just states this formula but i don't really understand his 'justification' nor do I see a why to derive it myself. I tried to play around with the Pauli-Lubanski-Vector since it is in the massless limit related to helicity but with no success...

Do any of you guys have an idea?
Thanks,
earth2
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's easy to see that formula if you think about the amplitude in precisely the manner in which Witten doesn't want to, namely in terms of the momenta and polarization vectors. Expand the amplitude in a series

\hat{A}(\lambda_i,\bar{\lambda}_i, h_i) = \sum C_{\mu_1\cdots \mu_n \nu_1\cdots \nu_m} p_1^{\mu_1} \cdots p_n^{\mu_n} \epsilon_1^{\nu_1} \cdots \epsilon_m^{\nu_m} ,

where C_{\mu_1\cdots \mu_n \nu_1\cdots \nu_m} are some coefficients that take into account however the momenta and polarizations are contracted. It is an important fact that each particle in the amplitude contributes one and only one polarization vector, so no factor of \epsilon_i is repeated.

Now under the maps

p_i^\mu \rightarrow \lambda^i_a \tilde{\lambda}^i_{\dot{a}}
\epsilon_i^\nu \rightarrow \frac{\lambda^i_a \tilde{\mu}^i_{\dot{a}}}{\langle \tilde{\lambda}^i,\tilde{\mu}^i\rangle} ~\tex{or}~\frac{\mu^i_a \tilde{\lambda}^i_{\dot{a}}}{\langle \lambda,\mu\rangle},

we consider the action of

H_i = \lambda^a_i \frac{\partial}{\partial\lambda^a_i} - \tilde{\lambda}^{\dot{a}}_i \frac{\partial}{\partial\tilde{\lambda}^{\dot{a}}_i}.

When H_i acts on a momentum factor, we obtain zero, since acting on \tilde{\lambda} cancels the action on \lambda. When H_i acts on a positive helicity polarization vector we find

- \frac{\mu^i_a \tilde{\lambda}^i_{\dot{a}}}{\langle \lambda,\mu\rangle^2}\langle \lambda,\mu\rangle - \frac{\mu^i_a \tilde{\lambda}^i_{\dot{a}}}{\langle \lambda,\mu\rangle} = -2(+1) \frac{\mu^i_a \tilde{\lambda}^i_{\dot{a}}}{\langle \lambda,\mu\rangle}

Similarly on a negative helicity polarization vector, we obtain a factor of 2 = -2(-1). So we can conclude that

H_i \hat{A}(\lambda_i,\bar{\lambda}_i, h_i) = - 2 h_i \hat{A}(\lambda_i,\bar{\lambda}_i, h_i) .
 


Thanks for your help! That solved my problem :)
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top