Question re: time dilation equations

mathyou9
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For both time dilation equations (kinematic and gravitational) I have often seen

\Delta t^\prime = \frac{\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

and

\Delta t' = \frac{\Delta t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}}}

I'll calls these equations as "Set A"

------------------------

And at other times as

\Delta t = \frac{\Delta t_0}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

and

\Delta t = \frac{\Delta t_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}}}

I'll calls these equations as "Set B"

---

I'm no physics (or mathematics) major (just a dilettante; that's why I'm asking.) Why use t' (on the left side of the equals sign for "Set A" equations) but t0 (on the right side of the equals sign for "Set B" equations)? I realize an equation is only good as far as you can interpret it. And so I know these are the same equations, but why the difference?

Thanks. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be nice if all physicists agreed on the symbols used to represent physical quantities in equations. Unfortunately they don't. In case of apparent conflict, you need to read the text surrounding the equations carefully, to find out how each author defines his symbols.
 
jtbell said:
It would be nice if all physicists agreed on the symbols used to represent physical quantities in equations. Unfortunately they don't. In case of apparent conflict, you need to read the text surrounding the equations carefully, to find out how each author defines his symbols.
Of course. Universality of equation symbology would be nice, but that'll never happen. :-)

---

Completely tangential to my OP: I can easily plug numbers into the kinematic time dilation equation without even thinking about it. But I've never really involved myself with the gravitation time dilation equation until recently. I'm still trying to get a firm grasp on it. With that said, can anyone provide me an example of the numbers to use in the gravitational time dilation equation regarding someone on the surface of the Earth as viewed by an observer very far away from earth?

Thanks, your response(s) are much appreciated.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
891
Back
Top