Question regarding Centripetal Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating centripetal acceleration for a lab report, two formulas are highlighted: Acceleration Centripetal = Force Centripetal/Mass and Acceleration Centripetal = Velocity^2/Radius. The results obtained from both formulas are close, with values of .625 and .631 respectively. The accuracy of these values depends on the precision of the measurements used in the calculations. To determine which formula yields a more accurate result, it's essential to analyze the measurement methods and any potential errors involved. The consensus is that both formulas should theoretically provide similar accuracy, but practical measurement accuracy will ultimately influence the results.
accesskb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm doing a lab report on centripetal acceleration and we are asked to find the centripetal acceleration using 2 formulas.
(1)Acceleration Centripetal=Force Centripetal/Mass

(2)Acceleration Centripetal=Velocity^2/Radius

I get answers that are very close but I also have to answer the question (Which value of Acceleration Centripetal would be considered more accurate? ie: which formula would be more accurate?)

hope someone can help me out here. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formulas should yield the same "accuracy". The difference will be in your ability to measure. Which of your measurements are the most accurate?
 
I get answers that are very very close. .625 for the first formula and .631 with the second formula
 
What measurements did you make? How did you make them? What are the measurement errors?

You need to consider the answers to these questions in order to determine which of the given forumlas yield the best answer.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top