Question regarding digits in base 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter GridironCPJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base
AI Thread Summary
In base 2, decimal strings can represent the same value as other strings, similar to base 10. For example, 0.11111... in base 2 equals 1, just as 0.9999... equals 1 in base 10. Additionally, 0.0111... in base 2 is equivalent to 0.1, paralleling how 0.49999... equals 0.5 in base 10. This indicates that repeating decimals in different bases can yield the same numerical values. Understanding these conversions is essential for solving problems involving various number bases.
GridironCPJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a decimal string in base 2 (ex: 0.10111000...) then are there any of these that equal the same number in [0, 1]? I was never formally introduced to anything like this, yet I'm being asked questions involving base 2, base 3, etc. If someone could answer this, it would help me solve a problem involving such a fact.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps, you want to know how to change base from 2 to decimal?

http://mathbits.com/mathbits/compsci/Introduction/frombase10.htm

http://www.mathpath.org/concepts/Num/frac.htm

From that, can you conclude whether they can be same??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just as, in base 10, 0.9999...= 1 so, in base 2, 0.11111...= 1.

Similarly, in base 10, 0.49999...= 0.5 and, in base 2, 0.0111...= 0.1 and so forth.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top