Question regarding integrating (int(1/u))

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linday12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function \(\int \frac{1}{u} du\) is definitively expressed as \(\ln |u|\). This is because the absolute value is necessary to ensure the logarithm remains defined for both positive and negative values of \(u\). While \(\ln(u)\) may appear acceptable in certain contexts, it can lead to undefined results if \(u\) is negative. The discussion clarifies that using absolute values is crucial for maintaining mathematical rigor in integration, particularly when applying the u-substitution method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, specifically integration.
  • Familiarity with the u-substitution method in integration.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties.
  • Ability to differentiate between positive and negative values in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions, focusing on the significance of absolute values.
  • Practice more examples of u-substitution in integration to solidify understanding.
  • Explore the implications of undefined values in logarithmic functions when integrating.
  • Review calculus textbooks or online resources that cover integration techniques and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, particularly those struggling with integration techniques and the use of logarithmic functions. This discussion is also beneficial for educators seeking to clarify common misconceptions in teaching integration methods.

Linday12
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm confused about integrating something like [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\frac{1}{u}[/tex]
Sometimes the answer seems to be ln|u| and sometimes just ln(u), and I wasn't sure why it is different from problem to problem. (after subbing u back in; I'm using the u-sub method)

It looks like the answer should be very straight forward as I can't find an explanation, so I'm not seeing something. My only guess would be that the absolute value symbols are used only if a negative value of x could give a negative value for u when subbing back in, making the ln(blah) undefined (for my course anyways). Is this about right? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry about it. The integral should be ln(|u|) because deriving that gives you 1/u for both u>0 and u<0. Sometimes, writing ln(u) works because (1) it's convenient and (2) it often works out in the end even if u is negative and the absolute value sign is ignored.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K