Question regarding water pressure and slopes

AI Thread Summary
Two identical pressure sensors at the same ocean depth will read the same pressure, regardless of the surrounding slopes. The discussion highlights that static pressure is uniform and does not depend on the shape of the surrounding container. When considering flow through orifices, the flow rate is influenced by multiple factors beyond just pressure, including orifice design. The conversation also emphasizes the distinction between flow rate and force, clarifying that force is only relevant when the water stream impacts another surface. Overall, the principles of hydrostatics and fluid dynamics play a crucial role in understanding these scenarios.
Jstoff
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Questioning regarding water pressure PSI and slopes.
I have a question about water pressure PSI regarding the presents/lack of slopes.

If two identical pressure sensors are set up on the ocean floor at the same depth. One being surrounded by a cone of ramps increasing in height moving outwards away from it. The second sitting on a flat plain with no increase or decrease of the surrounding ocean floor. (I've attached an illustration for explain.) In this situation would the sensors read the same or different PSI? If different which one would be higher?

Sorry if this isn't the correct area to post in. Wasn't sure what this fit under honestly. Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Waterpressure.jpg
    Waterpressure.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 162
Engineering news on Phys.org
Lnewqban said:
Welcome!
Both sensors will read the same value of pressure.

Please, see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-depend-on-the-shape-of-the-container.978355/
I appreciate the quick reply! Thanks for the link I believe it really cleared things up for me. It also made me relies that i forgot an important part of my question. To be honestly I'm not sure what measurement would be most appropriate for the answer of this question. I believe its head pressure but I'm not sure if I'm using it in the right context.

What if sensors 1 and 2 were replaced with twos holes of the exact same dimensions. On the other side of the hole there's a large empty container. Would the force of water coming out the other side be the same? I'm assuming they would if the static water's PSI was the same. Just i just wanted to make sure.
 
You understand that the static pressure (with nothing moving) is always the same.
The flow rate through an orifice depends upon more things than just the pressure. Our ability to describe such situations simply is very limited although it has been the subject of intense scrutiny for as long as there has been science. Now we have powerful computing machines and it is still difficult. In previous decades and centuries various specific and extraordinarilly clever approximations in fluid dynamics have been developed.
In general a more "streamlined" (a term from said fluid dynamics) orifice will produce more flow.
 
Jstoff said:
... What if sensors 1 and 2 were replaced with twos holes of the exact same dimensions. On the other side of the hole there's a large empty container. Would the force of water coming out the other side be the same? I'm assuming they would if the static water's PSI was the same. Just i just wanted to make sure.
I can’t visualize what you describe, but Pascal’s law could be applied to that case:

Please, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatics
 
Jstoff said:
Would the force of water coming out the other side be the same?
It's not a force that come out, but it is quantified as flow rate, either volumetric or mass(emetric), momentum, velocity. The force comes about only when the stream contacts another surface and should not be confused with the above.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and hutchphd
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top