Questions about magnetic energy, why dont we have it?

AI Thread Summary
Permanent magnets do exist and do not necessarily decay over time, meaning they can maintain their magnetic properties indefinitely. However, when energy is generated using magnets, the magnets exert a counterforce, requiring more energy input than the output produced. This principle underlines why perpetual motion machines are not feasible, as they violate fundamental scientific laws. The discussion emphasizes that while magnetic energy can be harnessed, it cannot create energy without an external input. Overall, the concept of perpetual motion remains a theoretical impossibility in physics.
Denken
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I've been thinking about this for a while now, but seeing as I am still in high school i really do not have much of a background to help me out with this. My dad asked me a while ago if we had ever discussed perpetual motion machines, and of course that got me thinking on how one could possible work. So, first i have some basic questions that will either end the theory where it is or inspire it to go farther.
Magnets, i know you can create them but is there such a thing as a permanent magnet, do they decay, or stay constant?

Does moving through a coil to produce electricity reduce the strength or force of a magnet over time?

and finally is there something along the lines of magnetic friction, or maybe friction between magnetic fields?

thank you to anyone who can answer these questions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

1. No, magnets don't necessarily "wear out". In other words, the electrical energy generated by them is not at the expense of degrading the magnetism.
2. Yes, when you generate energy using magnets, the magnets push back, so you have to input as much energy (or even a lot more) than you get out.

The reason perpetual motion in general is not discussed in science class is that it is an explicit violation of some of the most fundamental principles of science and it therefore doesn't work/exist.

Here's a couple of links for more information, but beyond that, since this is a site for discussing science, not a site for discussing things that sound like science but aren't, thread locked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top