Questions about Normalized Eigenfunc, Probability & Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on three key questions regarding quantum mechanics: the form of the normalized momentum eigenfunction, the relationship between probability density and particle density, and the construction of the Hamiltonian for a many-body problem. Liboff's normalized momentum eigenfunction for unbounded systems is expressed as \(\frac{1}{2\pi} \exp[ikx]\). The probability density, represented as \(\Psi \Psi^{*}\), is confirmed to equate to particle density through the continuity equation \(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot J = 0\). Lastly, the Hamiltonian for a two-particle system with interaction \(V(x)\) is formulated as \(H = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{2}} + V(x)\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with wave functions and eigenfunctions
  • Knowledge of continuity equations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Dirac delta function and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the continuity equation in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about constructing Hamiltonians for multi-particle systems
  • Investigate the concept of probability current density and its physical significance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and researchers working on many-body problems in quantum systems.

good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have three question. First is form of normalized momentum egien function


Liboff said that of unbounded is \frac{1}{2\pi}exp[ikx] But Why should this

form be normalized eigen function of momentum in unbounded?


Second question is whether probability density is equall to particle density.

Deriving Continuity Equation of QM, Original form of Equation is \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla\bullet J = 0

Replacing \rho to \Psi give probability current density.

But what does it means? My idea about this quantity is unclear. Please Give me a relavent

example!


Third question is How to construct Hamiltonian of many body problem.

Is it right that considering two particle with interaciton of V(x),where x is distance between

two particle, Hamiltonian of the system(not particle) is H = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{2}} + v(x)? How can i solve this form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first couple are easy and I'll comment quickly (do not have the time to answer all of them).

If you normalize a plane wave, you are actually using a Dirac-delta function definition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function

Look part way down the page for Fourier definitions.

\Psi \Psi^{*} is the probability density the integral over all space is equated to \rho.

This is the basis of QM.

Hope this helped.
 
Thank you for your help I solved my first question. But How about second and third question? Anyone know about this well?

I can't imagine real meaning of the Probability current density!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K