Questions about Normalized Eigenfunc, Probability & Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have three question. First is form of normalized momentum egien function


Liboff said that of unbounded is \frac{1}{2\pi}exp[ikx] But Why should this

form be normalized eigen function of momentum in unbounded?


Second question is whether probability density is equall to particle density.

Deriving Continuity Equation of QM, Original form of Equation is \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla\bullet J = 0

Replacing \rho to \Psi give probability current density.

But what does it means? My idea about this quantity is unclear. Please Give me a relavent

example!


Third question is How to construct Hamiltonian of many body problem.

Is it right that considering two particle with interaciton of V(x),where x is distance between

two particle, Hamiltonian of the system(not particle) is H = \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{1}} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{2}} + v(x)? How can i solve this form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first couple are easy and I'll comment quickly (do not have the time to answer all of them).

If you normalize a plane wave, you are actually using a Dirac-delta function definition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function

Look part way down the page for Fourier definitions.

\Psi \Psi^{*} is the probability density the integral over all space is equated to \rho.

This is the basis of QM.

Hope this helped.
 
Thank you for your help I solved my first question. But How about second and third question? Anyone know about this well?

I can't imagine real meaning of the Probability current density!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top