Questions about superconductivity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Antigone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductivity
Antigone
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi

1) Can all chemical elements be superconductive?

2) It is said that in diamagnetic materials there are no unpaired electrons. Does this mean that only such materials can be superconductive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antigone said:
Hi

1) Can all chemical elements be superconductive?

This is vague. Are you asking of a metal made of just one element can be a superconductor? Then yes. Hg, the first superconductor discovered, is made up of just one element. If you are asking if a free atomic element can become a superconductor, then that question makes no sense because an element isn't a solid and has no "conduction" properties.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
This is vague. Are you asking of a metal made of just one element can be a superconductor? Then yes. Hg, the first superconductor discovered, is made up of just one element. If you are asking if a free atomic element can become a superconductor, then that question makes no sense because an element isn't a solid and has no "conduction" properties.

Zz.

Not all elements are superconductors, i think so, or at least we don't know conditions (temperature, pressure) should be for some elements such as copper , gold to become superconductors
 
vatlychatran said:
Not all elements are superconductors, i think so, or at least we don't know conditions (temperature, pressure) should be for some elements such as copper , gold to become superconductors

You need to read the statements carefully. I said that elemental solids CAN be a superconductor. That statement does NOT imply that ALL elements are superconductors!

Zz.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top