Questions about the multiverse theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter e_john96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiverse Theory
AI Thread Summary
The multiverse theory encompasses various models, including eternally cyclic and first-universe propagation theories, each suggesting different origins. There is currently no observational evidence supporting any multiverse theories, which largely remain mathematical extensions of existing physics or interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the many-worlds interpretation. The debate over whether the multiverse has a beginning is complex and varies by theory. Critics argue that religious perspectives, such as those from William Lane Craig, may bias interpretations of cosmological evidence. Ultimately, the nature of the universe's finiteness in space or time remains uncertain.
e_john96
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm interested in pre Big Bang theories at the moment and I have been reading about the multiverse theory. My question is, is the multiverse thought to have a beginning? It seems if it didn't it would end the first cause debate. Although, I stumbled across a video of William Lane Craig arguing that even the multiverse must have a beginning - but not being a physicist and a Christian one might have to take what he has to say on that with a pinch of salt.

Please excuse my lack of knowledge on physics!

Many thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
depends on the multi-verse theory your studying. For example you could be studying an eternally cyclic multi-verse theory. Or you could be studying one that had a first universe that propagated other universes.. The number of different multi-verse theories is immense. However we have no observational evidence of any of them. Most are merely mathematical extensions of the physics we study in this universe. Others are extensions of interpretations in quantum processes. Such as many worlds interpretation.
 
I see, interesting. Thanks
 
Yeah, I wouldn't listen to anything Craig says on cosmology. He is a religious apologist hunting for ways to prove that the universe is of finite age.
 
We do not know if the universe is finite in space or time. The observable universe is clearly bounded in both respects, but, those boundaries are merely a consequence of our incomplete knowledge.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top