B Questions about the Universe: Positive & negative fields and effects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of an article claiming that the universe's essence is impossible due to established physical laws, such as the gravitational constant and the speed of light. It argues that the coexistence of positive and negative fields would cancel electromagnetic forces, undermining the structural integrity of matter. Participants express skepticism about the article's claims, suggesting that they are nonsensical and not grounded in actual physics. The conversation shifts towards the importance of discussing legitimate scientific concepts rather than debunking perceived nonsense. Ultimately, the thread is temporarily locked for moderation due to disagreements among participants.
Muhammed20382
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
.
So I saw an article about the universe and lets say the article saied:
the essence of the universe, which is impossible, as it has been proven that universal constants such as the gravitational constant and the speed of light indicate the existence of unified physical laws that govern the entire universe. For instance, gravity is always considered an attractive force and cannot be a repulsive force. Similarly, it is impossible to imagine the speed of light being positive and negative at the same time. As for charges and fields, their existence with opposing signals would lead to the cancellation of their mutual effects and the impossibility of the existence of electromagnetic forces. Additionally, the presence of positive and negative masses would lead to the collapse of the structural integrity of matter itself at the quantum level.

Electric and magnetic fields always arise from electric charges and currents. If we follow the assumption of the coexistence of positive and negative fields, they would cancel each other's effects due to the expansion of the universe. Therefore, the negative field will increase the charge of positive particles and reduce the charge of negative particles, while the positive field will do the opposite. Since the two effects are opposing, they would cancel each other out, making the existence of electromagnetic forces impossible. Furthermore, the repulsion between positive and negative electrons in orbits would make the formation of matter fundamentally impossible.

However, if we abandon all of this and assume that it happened, the electric and magnetic fields would completely mix, making it impossible to distinguish the characteristics of both. Of course, this is absurd since the existence of the electromagnetic spectrum contradicts such a notion."

I came here to have a discussion about the article bcuz I see that the majority of what is being saied is nonsense so I think we could have a discussion about it if it's false or not which will really upgrade my knowledge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Please post a link to the article. Thank you.
 
Muhammed20382 said:
I came here to have a discussion about the article bcuz I see that the majority of what is being saied is nonsense so I think we could have a discussion about it if it's false or not which will really upgrade my knowledge.
Breaking down nonsense is a waste of time. Study some actual physics and forget all that word salad.

We don't debunk nonsense here, we discuss actual science. If you have questions about some of the concepts, that's great. Break them down one at a time and ask questions in the appropriate forums.

Also, just FYI, we speak English here not social media speak, like "bcuz"
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, topsquark, Bystander and 1 other person
Thread locked temporarily for Moderation...
 
Whelp, it seems that the OP was not happy with my reply or the reply by @phinds, so tried to delete their post. The post has been restored, and this thread will remain closed for now. Have a nice day. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444, russ_watters, Vanadium 50 and 3 others
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top