Questions on Kinetic Theory of Gases

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic theory of gases, specifically addressing the assumptions regarding intermolecular forces (IMF) at varying temperatures and pressures. Participants explore the implications of these assumptions and question the coexistence of high temperature with either low or high pressure in gases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that kinetic theory assumes negligible IMF at low pressure or high temperature, questioning how high velocities at high temperatures lead to increased pressure through collisions.
  • Another participant explains that at higher temperatures, the kinetic energy of gas molecules surpasses the potential energy due to IMF, allowing for the neglect of these forces.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether a gas can exist at high temperature and low pressure or high temperature and high pressure, asking for illustrations to aid understanding.
  • Another reply asserts that the kinetic theory does not strictly require low pressure or high temperature, arguing that the potential energy is negligible compared to kinetic energy without needing to categorize pressures and temperatures.
  • One participant suggests that the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature (pV = nRT) indicates that it is possible to have high temperature and low pressure if volume is sufficiently increased.
  • Another participant expresses that discussing IMF effects in terms of gas pressure is less useful than considering them in terms of gas density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of pressure and temperature conditions in relation to the kinetic theory of gases. There is no consensus on the implications of IMF in these scenarios, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the coexistence of high temperature with varying pressures.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the assumptions in kinetic theory and the potential oversimplification of relating pressure and temperature. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of how IMF should be considered in the context of gas behavior.

ananthu
Messages
105
Reaction score
1
I have some questions on kinetic theory of gases:

kinetic theory assumes that the inter molecular force of attraction between two molecules of a gas is negligible. This assumption applies to the condition that the said gas is either at low pressure or at high temperature. This means, when the gas is at low pressure, the molecules will be far apart and therefore the IMF is negligible. Or,also when at high temperature they will be far apart and same is true.
But the following thing is not clear to me. When the temperature is high, the velocities of the molecules will be also be high and this should result in more number of collisions which will other wise increase the pressure. that is, when the temperature is high the pressure should be also high.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, the kinetic theory of gases boils down to the assumption that the pressure is result of the collisions between molecules and ignores the contributions from the IMF. At higher temperatures, the kinetic energy of the molecules will be much higher than the potential energy between the molecules. Thus, the IMF can be neglected. At lower pressures the "average distance" between the molecules will be large & thus the IMF will be weaker.
 
Thank you for the replly.
But my specific doubts were not answered.

My question is whether it is possible for a gas to exist simultaneously at higher temperature and at lower pressure or higher temperature and at higher pressure?

If so, how? In that case, how to deal with the IMF aspect? If anybody gives explanations with simple illustrations, it will be helpful to me.
 
ananthu said:
Thank you for the replly.
But my specific doubts were not answered.

My question is whether it is possible for a gas to exist simultaneously at higher temperature and at lower pressure or higher temperature and at higher pressure?

If so, how? In that case, how to deal with the IMF aspect? If anybody gives explanations with simple illustrations, it will be helpful to me.
The point regarding high/low pressures/temperatures is somewhat irrelevant here. The kinetic theory of gases does not assume that the gas is either at a low pressure nor at a high temperature. It merely assumes that the potential energy of the gas is negligible when compared with the kinetic energy of the gas.

Discussion of the corresponding pressures and temperatures is a somewhat misleading over simplification in order to "justify" these assumptions. Roughly, the postulates of kinetic theory can be found on the wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_theory . Note the absence of any reference to high/low pressures/temperatures.

Your question of the simultaneous existence of a gas with high temperature and low pressure is moot as it isn't relevant with how we deal with the IMF aspect, as you put it.
 
Last edited:
"My question is whether it is possible for a gas to exist simultaneously at higher temperature and at lower pressure or higher temperature and at higher pressure?"

That part of your question seems to be answered by pV = nRT; it all depends what you do to V. If you increase V enough at the same time that you increase T, then P can fall, and so on.

This, of course, uses the ideal gas approximation, but in most circumstances the argument will work with real gases.

I've never felt it helpful to discuss the effects of IMFs in terms of gas pressure. It seems to me that it's much more useful to discuss them in terms of gas density.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K