Quick question about positive beta decay and mass defect?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of positive beta decay in nuclear physics, specifically focusing on the energy released during the decay process and the implications of using atomic masses versus nuclear masses in calculations. Participants explore the source of the factor of two in the energy equation and the relationship between atomic and nuclear masses.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the factor of two in the energy equation for positive beta decay, suggesting it relates to an excess of electrons after the decay.
  • Another participant explains that using atomic masses, which include the mass of electrons, leads to the factor of two in the energy calculation.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the justification for using atomic mass in a nuclear physics context, given the focus on nuclear processes.
  • Further clarification is provided that atomic masses are what are typically measured in experiments, such as mass spectrometry, which complicates the removal of electrons from atoms.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about relating the concepts graphically, indicating a lack of clarity on the visual representation of the discussed ideas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the source of the factor of two relating to atomic masses, but there is ongoing confusion regarding the justification for using atomic masses in nuclear physics and how to visualize these concepts. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of graphical representation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of using atomic versus nuclear masses and the graphical representation of the decay process. There are unresolved questions about the conceptual clarity of these relationships.

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I was wondering about something in my notes that I don't quite understand. In positive beta decay in nuclear physics, we have a proton becoming a neutron and kicking out a positron and an electron neutrino (which is assumed massless here).

In the expression for the energy released, Q = [M(A,Z) - M(A,Z-1) - 2me]c2, we have the kinetic energy of the products is equal to the mass-energy of the original nucleus minus the mass energy of the new nucleus minus TWO electron masses.
This factor of two is what confuses me.

All my notes really say is that this is due to an excess of electrons. Now I assume what this means is that originally the atom is electrically neutral, with equal numbers of protons and electrons. After this decay, we are one proton short, so there is on excessive electron in an atomic electron shell.

I still do not see where this extra electron mass-energy comes from though, because the excess electron in question is not being created, it was always there. All that has been created is one positron, and we are assuming the neutrino to be massless.

Can anyone explain this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we were to use nuclear masses in the calculation, there would be no factor of 2:

Q = M_{nuc}(A,Z) - M_{nuc}(A,Z-1) - m_e

However, the masses that we actually find in the standard tables are atomic masses of neutral atoms, which include the mass of Z electrons: M(A,Z) = M_{nuc}(A,Z) + Zm_e. Substituting for the nuclear masses in the first equation:

Q = [M(A,Z) - Zm_e] - [M(A,Z-1) - (Z-1)m_e] - m_e

Remove the brackets and parentheses, collect terms, and you end up with your equation with the "extra" factor of 2.
 
ah cheers for that jtbell.

can I ask what the justification is for using the atomic mass? its just that the title of my module is "nuclear physics" after all.
 
Probably because what we measure in mass spectrometers etc. is the atomic mass, or something close to it, e.g. a singly-charged ion. It's kind of hard to strip all the electrons off, say, an iron or a uranium atom.
 
I am as confused as the thread starter =)

I get that the M(A,Z) - M(A,Z-1) - 2Me is from the atomic mass..

I just don't know how to relate these graphically..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K