Quick question about Simple Harmonic Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the notation used in equations for Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM). The equation \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} is correctly identified as relating angular frequency to spring constant and mass. However, the book in question uses p instead of \omega, leading to misunderstandings about the relationship between momentum and angular frequency. The consensus is that p is being used interchangeably with \omega, which is considered poor notation, but it is advisable to rewrite formulas consistently for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion in physics
  • Knowledge of angular frequency and its relation to mass and spring constant
  • Basic grasp of momentum in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of angular frequency in SHM
  • Study the differences between momentum and angular frequency
  • Learn how to create a formula sheet for physics equations
  • Explore common notational conventions in physics literature
USEFUL FOR

Physics students preparing for the GRE, educators teaching undergraduate physics, and anyone seeking clarity on the notation and concepts of Simple Harmonic Motion.

Dr. Mirrage
I'm going to dispense with the provided template for this, I hope no one minds.

I always understood that for simple harmonic motion there was this equation:
[tex]\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

However, I recently got a book that helps you study for the Physics GRE (Graduate Record Examination).
There is a quick review in there covering all the material that you should learn as an undergraduate physics student. However, it just made me confused when I got to this part about Simple Harmonic Motion, because they write the above equation as:
[tex]p^{2} = \frac{k}{m}[/tex]
which is basically the exact same thing except they have "p" instead of "[itex]\omega[/itex]" which is "momentum" instead of "angular frequency", right?
Furthermore, they proceed to cause more confusion for me by writing things like:
[tex]x = x_{m} sin(pt + \phi)[/tex]
shouldn't it be "[itex]\omega t[/itex]" instead of "pt"?

So I was thinking maybe they just use the character "p" for "angular frequency", but then the very next equation I see in the book is: [itex]Period = T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}[/itex]
I know that equation is correct, and they definitely used the character "omega" for "angular frequency"..

I've then been trying to show that [itex]p = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} = \omega[/itex] But have so far been unsuccessful.
I would be very grateful if someone could help me sort this out. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the template doesn't apply, it's probably not a homework question, is it? :wink:

Anyway, the equations you've got there only make sense if p is angular frequency. So I would just assume that [itex]p = \omega[/itex], i.e. that they are using both letters for the same physical quantity. It's bad notation, but what can you do...

Actually you could rewrite the formulas to use [itex]\omega[/itex], so they look right to you. Making your own formula sheet (even if you can't use it on the test) is a good practice in general.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K