Quick question about which radius to use on Gauss' law problem

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about Gauss' law, participants clarify the use of radii in calculating electric fields for different scenarios. For part A, the electric field is approximated as that of an infinite sheet due to proximity, leading to the formula E = σ/(2ε₀). In part B, the distance from the sheet makes it behave like a point charge, resulting in E = Q/(4πε₀r²). The confusion regarding the use of different radii is addressed, emphasizing that for varying distances, the calculations may become more complex and require integration. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying Gauss' law in different contexts.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A square insulating sheet 80.0 cm on a side is held horizontally. The sheet has 4.50 nC of charge spread uniformly over its area. (a) Estimate the electric field at a point 0.100 mm above the center of the sheet. (b) Estimate the electric field at a point 100 m above the center of the sheet.
Relevant Equations
E= Q/2eA
Q= (4.5*10^-9)
confused on part A/B when I look up they did E= Q/2e(0.8)^2.

But why not use the 0.100mm because that is the area of the enclosed.

Same with B why did they use 100m and not 0.8m because 0.8 is smaller so it enclosed the charge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Hi,

For part (a) you are so close to the sheet that it's as good as an infinite sheet. So you get
$$E = \frac \sigma {2\varepsilon_0}\ .$$
For part (b) you are so far away that the sheet looks almost like a point charge, so you get
$$E = \frac Q {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r 2}\ .$$
##\ ##
Thank you now it makes sense. But for clarification, if they have given us 1m instead of 100m then we use 0.8m?
 
No. In that region the expression for the field becomes more complicated (it becomes an integral, if you are familiar with those $$E = \int \frac Q {4\pi\varepsilon_0\, r^2}\ \,dy\, dx \quad $$.)

cf the disc of charge

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top