Quick question about which radius to use on Gauss' law problem

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about Gauss' law, participants clarify the use of radii in calculating electric fields for different scenarios. For part A, the electric field is approximated as that of an infinite sheet due to proximity, leading to the formula E = σ/(2ε₀). In part B, the distance from the sheet makes it behave like a point charge, resulting in E = Q/(4πε₀r²). The confusion regarding the use of different radii is addressed, emphasizing that for varying distances, the calculations may become more complex and require integration. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying Gauss' law in different contexts.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A square insulating sheet 80.0 cm on a side is held horizontally. The sheet has 4.50 nC of charge spread uniformly over its area. (a) Estimate the electric field at a point 0.100 mm above the center of the sheet. (b) Estimate the electric field at a point 100 m above the center of the sheet.
Relevant Equations
E= Q/2eA
Q= (4.5*10^-9)
confused on part A/B when I look up they did E= Q/2e(0.8)^2.

But why not use the 0.100mm because that is the area of the enclosed.

Same with B why did they use 100m and not 0.8m because 0.8 is smaller so it enclosed the charge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Hi,

For part (a) you are so close to the sheet that it's as good as an infinite sheet. So you get
$$E = \frac \sigma {2\varepsilon_0}\ .$$
For part (b) you are so far away that the sheet looks almost like a point charge, so you get
$$E = \frac Q {4\pi\varepsilon_0 r 2}\ .$$
##\ ##
Thank you now it makes sense. But for clarification, if they have given us 1m instead of 100m then we use 0.8m?
 
No. In that region the expression for the field becomes more complicated (it becomes an integral, if you are familiar with those $$E = \int \frac Q {4\pi\varepsilon_0\, r^2}\ \,dy\, dx \quad $$.)

cf the disc of charge

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top