R squared or coefficients for prediction

xeon123
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
I created a little model that predicts the time a task will take to execute. Than, I calculate the real time that the task took to execute. With the predict and real value I have the error of my prediction. I want to use that error to predict the next execution (the next execution is a similar task has the one I ran). I was looking to R-squared or coefficients to help me. Does anyone has an opinion about this. What is the best use I can do to the error of my prediction to help to predict again?

For now I am using Adjusted R^2, but I don't know other methods.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would use the mean squared error (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_squared_error). The formula is $$MSE = \frac 1 n \sum_{i = 1}^n(Y_i - \hat{Y_i})^2$$
Here ##Y_i## is the actual time of the i-th task, and ##\hat{Y_i}## is the predicted time of the same task.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top