Radar as range detector between cars-static sender vs dynamic sender

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of radar for measuring distances and velocities between cars, specifically focusing on the Doppler effect and the implications of moving versus stationary sources and receivers. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical applications, and potential misconceptions related to radar technology.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a radar system where a car uses Doppler shift to detect distance from another car, raising questions about the treatment of moving and stationary sources.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that propagation velocity changes when the receiver moves relative to a static sender, asserting that the speed of light remains constant.
  • Some participants clarify that Doppler shift measures relative velocity, not distance, and emphasize the need for timing measurements of radar pulses to determine distance.
  • A participant proposes that two Doppler shifts occur during the radar pulse's lifetime, seeking to express the total Doppler shift mathematically.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the radar system type and provides references for further reading on FMCW radar systems.
  • Another participant questions whether the propagation velocity changes in FMCW radar when the target moves relative to a static source, noting potential errors in range calculations due to Doppler shifts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on the interpretation of propagation velocity in relation to moving targets and static sources. There is no consensus on whether the propagation velocity changes in FMCW radar systems, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of Doppler shifts on distance measurements.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the assumptions made about the radar systems and the definitions of terms like "propagation velocity." The discussion highlights the complexity of radar technology and the nuances involved in measuring distance and velocity.

marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
Say I have a radar transmitter on a car,used to detect its distance from a car in front of it by measuring the doppler shift on the reflected wave.
i.e Car 1 is the source, its wave gets reflected by Car 2 in front of it.

My book splits the problem of calculating the Doppler shift by computing the frequencies w.r.t relative velocity.

1.When the source emits(Car1),take it as stationary by considering the receiver to move at relative velocity.

2.When the receiver reflects(Car2),take it as stationary by considering the source to move at relative velocity.

The book goes on to give the following statements:

1.If the sender moves relative to a static receiver,the wavelength changes.The received frequency now will be:
$$f_{receiver}=\frac{c_{sent}}{\lambda_{receiver}}=\frac{{c_{sent}}}{\lambda-\frac{v_{rel}}{f}}$$

2.If the receiver moves relative to a static sender,the propagation velocity changes**(but not the wavelength??)**.The received frequency now will be:
$$f_{receiver}=\frac{c_{receiver}}{\lambda}=\frac{c_{sent}+v_{relative}}{\lambda}$$Q***Shouldn't the wavelength also change when the waves get reflected back by the moving receiver?*** The above equation no.2 says it doesn't.

I can't attach images because I just joined.
 

Attachments

  • sendreceive.jpg
    sendreceive.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 450
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
marellasunny said:
2.If the receiver moves relative to a static sender,the propagation velocity changes.

Your book is wrong. Take it back to wherever you bought it and get your money back. The propagation velocity can only change in direction, not magnitude. Any suggestion that the speed of light is anything but constant is crack-pot thinking.
 
Agree with mrspeedybob: take your book back and demand your money back! One point of difference, however: your opening statement is false. "...Say I have a radar transmitter on a car,used to detect its distance from a car in front of it by measuring the doppler shift on the reflected wave."

You cannot measure the distance to the car in front by using the Doppler shift. You can only measure the relative opening or closing velocity.

To measure the distance you must send a pulse, wait for it to go to the other car (target), be reflected, and travel back. The radar set will measure the time required for the pulse to return and that will be proportional to the distance. Just for reference: One "radar range nautical mile" (that is, round trip) is equal to around 12.36 microseconds.
 
Bobbywhy said:
To measure the distance you must send a pulse, wait for it to go to the other car (target), be reflected, and travel back. The radar set will measure the time required for the pulse to return and that will be proportional to the distance. Just for reference: One "radar range nautical mile" (that is, round trip) is equal to around 12.36 microseconds.

So,then its 2 doppler shifts occurring over the entire pulse lifetime right?-one at the observer and another back at the source. What would be the doppler shift in frequency after the wave gets reflected back and reaches back at the source?

total doppler shift in frequency=
(frequency of the initial pulse sent out from source)-(frequency of the pulse reflected back,now back at source)

I want to write the above equation in f=\frac{c}{\lambda} form. Can you please guide me?
I've attached the text from the book.
 

Attachments

  • radar.jpg
    radar.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 479
  • answer1.jpg
    answer1.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 513
marellasunny, Excuse me, I was mistaken in my post number 3. Those limitations do not apply to your project. Now I understand you are working with an FMCW Radar system.

As for your specific question(s) I can only refer you to these three sources, where I think you can find the answer(s) you need:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...p3QH8yOU4PXcl5Dfg&sig2=IqZGTFU3UuHq9dqtWYWWVw

http://www.siversima.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/FMCW-Radar-App-Notes-Frequency-Modulated-Continuous-Wave-Radar.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673098/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The papers use the 'phase difference' to measure the range between target and source. But, they don't say if the second case is validated in FMCW i.e If the target moves relative to a static source,the propagation velocity changes. Is it true in FMCW and why? Thanks for the papers and replies.
 
marellasunny said:
The papers use the 'phase difference' to measure the range between target and source. But, they don't say if the second case is validated in FMCW i.e If the target moves relative to a static source,the propagation velocity changes. Is it true in FMCW and why? Thanks for the papers and replies.

I'm not sure I understand exactly what is your question. If when using FMCW radar to measure the range to a target and that target moves radially with respect to a static source/receiver, then yes, the received signal will be Doppler shifted by some proportional amount. This may cause some error in the range measuring calculation (not sure about that). But, the "propagation velocity" never changes! It remains constant and is known as "c".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
923
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K