Radar Reflection: Charged vs Non-Charged Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter faiello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radar Reflection
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the radar reflection from an object differs based on its charge. Generally, it is suggested that charge does not significantly affect radar reflectivity unless in extreme conditions, such as a massive charge that alters the material's conductivity. Radar waves reflect off plasmas like the ionosphere, which are typically neutrally charged and behave more like conductors. The conversation hints at practical applications, possibly involving radar technology and extreme weather phenomena like lightning. Ultimately, the impact of charge on radar reflection remains largely theoretical and context-dependent.
faiello
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A question I’ve been trying to figure out for the last 5 years with a friend of mine:

Would the radar reflection from an object be different if the object is charged or not charged?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

faiello said:
Summary:: Does charge affect the reflectivity of radar?

A question I’ve been trying to figure out for the last 5 years with a friend of mine:

Would the radar reflection from an object be different if the object is charged or not charged?
Not for any reason that I can think of. Do you have a reason to believe it would?
 
For classical electromagnetism, you will want to learn about superposition early on in your studies.

Unless you have specific concerns about the materials involved, then no.

However, I can imagine that if there is an enormously large amount of charge (more than you're likely to ever see) then yes. If, somehow, you could strip a conductor of all of it's conduction band electrons, then it may act like an insulator. If you could add lots of electrons (like a static charge) to an insulator, then they would interact with the radar EM wave. In the real world, this doesn't happen.
 
DaveE said:
then it may act like an insulator.
Not just that - it would be charged to millions of GigaVolts so not easy to measure its resistivity.
 
faiello said:
Summary:: Does charge affect the reflectivity of radar?

A question I’ve been trying to figure out for the last 5 years with a friend of mine:

Would the radar reflection from an object be different if the object is charged or not charged?

Presumably you mean that the object has excess free charges (or not). Radar reflects off of the ionosphere (a plasma), which is one example of your question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-the-horizon_radar
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and sophiecentaur
Andy Resnick said:
Presumably you mean that the object has excess free charges (or not). Radar reflects off of the ionosphere (a plasma), which is one example of your question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-the-horizon_radar
However, a plasma is more or less neutrally charged so it's probably more like a conductor than an insulator - there being so many (almost equal numbers of) free electrons and ions around.

I think the question must be mainly about how you can affect the conductivity with an external field.

Perhaps (as usual) we should ask the OP about the context of this question which has almost certainly come out of some practical situation, involving radar. Perhaps involving lightning? Whatever, it would not be straight forward or ideal conditions.
 
My guess is that prospect of a radar "cloaking device" may be involved.
I would mention that light is in the same spectrum as radar (quite a bit shorter wavelength (##10^4## at least) and I don't know of any visual phenomena directly caused by charging the illuminated object to high potential.
 
When someone asks an open ended question it can take many posts before the real meat of the question gets revealed.
I often wonder if people imagine we have second sight on PF.
 
sophiecentaur said:
I often wonder if people imagine we have second sight on PF.
Mixing us up with PsychicsForums. :oldgrumpy:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
750
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K