I When Does the Radiation Epoch Begin with a Scale Factor of ~t1/2?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter PeteSampras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The radiation epoch begins after the inflation epoch, which lasts from approximately 10^-36 seconds to between 10^-33 and 10^-32 seconds post-Big Bang. During the radiation epoch, the scale factor is characterized by a ≈ t1/2. The end of this epoch is not clearly defined, occurring when the mass-energy density of radiation equals that of matter, but the specific ratio for this transition remains debated. The transition to the matter epoch is marked by a scale factor of a ≈ t2/3. Understanding these epochs is crucial for cosmological models and calculations.
PeteSampras
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
When begin the radiation epoch with scale factor ~t1/2 ?

I read in some text that this begin at Planck time, but in other texs says that begin approx at 3 minutes.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi Pete:
I am not sure how to define the beginning and end of the radiation epoch, but I will take a crack at it.

The beginning
The radiation epoch must come after the inflation epoch ends, since the scale factor during inflation is
a ≈ et.​

Here is a quote from Wikipedia:
The inflationary epoch lasted from 10−36 seconds after the conjectured Big Bang singularity to sometime between 10−33 and 10−32 seconds after the singularity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology) .​

You are correct that the radiation epoch is characterized by
a ≈ t1/2.​

The end
I don't think there is a well defined criterion for this. The end will occur before ρr, the mass-energy density of radiation (photons) equals the mass-energy density of matter ρm. The problem is deciding on the value of the ratio
R = ρr : ρm > 1​
to use for the end of the radiation epoch and the start of the transition to the matter epoch. When that transition ends, the matter epoch is characterized by
a ≈ t2/3.​

If you specify the value you want to use for R, it is easy to calculate the value of a which corresponds to this R value. Calculating the corresponding value for t is more difficult.

Regards,
Buzz
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top