MHB How can I solve radical equations using the given hint?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
AI Thread Summary
To solve the radical equation sqrt{x^4 - 13x^2 + 37} = 1, substitute x^2 with t, transforming the equation into t^2 - 13t + 36 = 0 after squaring both sides. This allows for factoring and finding the values of t, which are then back-substituted to find x. It's crucial to check all potential solutions due to the possibility of extraneous roots introduced by squaring. The process is straightforward, involving standard algebraic techniques. Ultimately, following these steps leads to the correct solutions for the equation.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Determine all of the real number solutions for the radical equation.

sqrt {x^4 - 13x^2 + 37} = 1

Hint given in textbook:

Let x^2 = t and x^4 = t^2

After applying the hint given, do I proceed as usual by squaring both sides?

I have to back-substitute somewhere in the solution steps, right?

Why is it important to always check the answer (s) when dealing with radical equations?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is solving as usual.
You can square both sides, then subtract 1 from both sides.
Factor as usual. Substitute back in.

Try it out and see if you get the correct answers.
 
joypav said:
Yes, it is solving as usual.
You can square both sides, then subtract 1 from both sides.
Factor as usual. Substitute back in.

Try it out and see if you get the correct answers.

Great. Ok. It's not so bad.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top